Keeping your drunk cousin from starting a fight at the wedding reception: a taxable service? From globegazette.com:
The state Department of Revenue is demanding that 46 Iowa police officers pay back sales taxes from years of working off-duty assignments such as wedding receptions and business security.
Department spokeswoman Victoria Daniels said the plan is to pursue back sales taxes for up to 10 years for those officers who have never filed tax returns for off-duty jobs.
Iowa only requires service providers to collect sales tax for “enumerated services.” CPA services and legal services are not “enumerated,” but “security and detective services” is, along with, for example, reflexology. The thin blue line is not pleased.
Iowa law enforcement groups have tried for years to convince the Revenue Department not to require police officers to collect sales tax from businesses and individuals who hire them for off-duty gigs. Revenue officials considered drafting a change to the state’s administrative code to exempt officers, but ultimately decided the law clearly required officers to pay up.
So this obviously isn’t news to the officers, who blew off the tax collection requirement anyway. Next time you get pulled over, try to convince the officer not to require you to slow down.
Aegis trust promoters sentences upheld. The Seventh Circuit has upheld long sentences for the masterminds behind a sham trust scheme that operated out of the Chicago suburb of Palos Hills in the 1990s. From the opinion:
The Aegis trusts were typically marketed to wealthy, self-employed individuals whose income could not be easily traced through the W-2 forms that are issued to ordinary taxpayers. Aegis representatives, including the defendants, conducted seminars promoting the Aegis trusts in cities around the country. Attendance at these seminars was by invitation only, and guests were charged between $150 and $500 to participate. Attendees were told at such seminars that use of the Aegis trust system would reduce if not eliminate their federal income taxes. They were often given materials that purported to document the legitimacy of the system with seemingly thorough and impressive citations to the various legal authorities that supported the trusts. But as one lawyer wrote to a client who sought his advice as to the legitimacy of the system:
“This material is full of errors, irrelevancies and partial truths followed by non sequiturs. I know that I must resist the temptation to follow every line or I could spend the rest of my life on this. I will concentrate on how, even if it were 99 percent correct, the claimed tax effects fail. In doing so, I’m not implying that that 99 percent is correct. I’m just skipping over the errors.”
The longest sentence is 223 months, which works out to over 18 years. Under federal sentencing rules, the sentence can be reduced by only about 10% for good time; there is no early out.
When genealogists go bad. From Billings, Montana via SFGate.com:
A Billings woman who said she filed false tax returns using the Social Security numbers and birth dates of deceased people she found while doing genealogy research online has been sentenced to more than four years in prison and ordered to pay nearly $130,000 in restitution to the IRS.
I am so sorry for my bad behavior. I have so many amends to make,” said Shannon Kathlina Grimm, 41.
Crying as she apologized to the court and to family members and friends, Grimm said, “I know I can be a good person. You will not see me again. I will not be in trouble again, I promise you.”
But Chief U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull told Grimm she deserved more time on top of what she has already spent locked up while the case was pending and sentenced her to four years and three months. The term was at the high end of the guideline range, which started at 41 months.
Cebull also ordered her to pay $129,498 restitution to the IRS.
“Obviously, Ms. Grimm has little, if any, respect for the law,” Cebull said. He noted Grimm’s state conviction for issuing bad checks and her violation of a deferred sentence. She was on probation when she committed the federal fraud crimes, he said.
Maybe it’s genealogy gone bad. Right, because ancestry research is notorious as a gateway to a life of crime.
For a good view of the fiscal cliff, Check out Roger McEowen’s List of Expired and Expiring Provisions.
Martin Sullivan, Wrong Turns At the Fiscal Cliff (Tax.com)
Jana Luttenegger, Cashing in on a Life Insurance Policy (Davis Brown Tax Law Blog)
Kay Bell, Bank forgiveness of phantom debt could create tax problems for former debtors. Of course, so does forgivenes of real debt.
How far can I throw them? How Much Do You Trust Congress? Exclusion from COD Income Related To Primary Residence Mortgages is Set to Expire in Three Months (Anthony Nitti)
Robert D. Flach, EVALUATING TAX RATES
Richard Morrison, Chart of the Day: Effective Tax Rates by Income Category (Tax Policy Blog)
Jason Dinesen, The Difficulties of Tax Planning with an Inept Congress. Of course, we keep sending them back.
Irwin Schiff loses motion to vacate conviction. Not a great surprise. (Jack Townsend)
Tags: aegis, Anthony Nitti, Going Concern, ID theft, Irwin Schiff, Jack Townsend, Jana Luttenegger, Jason Dinesen, Kay Bell, Paul Neiffer, Peter Reilly, Richard Morrison, Robert D Flach, Roger McEowen, Russ Fox, tax crime, tax fairy, TaxProf, The Critical Question