Department of Transportation enacts tax reduction. From the Des Moines Register:
Cities and counties would have to prove the need for traffic enforcement cameras on major highways under rules approved Tuesday by the Iowa Transportation Commission.
The new rules — which could take effect as early as February — would force a re-evaluation of all speeding and red-light cameras now placed on interstate highways, U.S. highways and state highways and require any new cameras to first win the Department of Transportation’s approval.
It’s not clear what effect this will have on the revenue cameras, like the one on Eastbound I-235 by Waveland Golf Course, but given the howls from the affected municipal pickpockets who profit from the cameras in the runup to the rules, I suspect it means fewer cameras. The municipalities like their tax on passing motorists, at least those who aren’t “special.”
Of course they always invoke safety, in spite of inconclusive or contradictory evidence. But if it really were about safety, you would see them experimenting with other solutions, like all-red phases at red lights and longer yellows. When they have to say it’s not about the money, it’s about the money.
Howard Gleckman, Whither the Tax Extenders? (TaxVox):
If published reports are correct–and if the deal does not fall apart–Congress would partially replace the hated automatic across-the-board spending cuts (the sequester) with more traditional targets for each federal agency. In effect, it would freeze discretionary spending at about $1 trillion-a-year for the next two years. Without a new agreement the 2014 level would be $967 billion.
The deal would replace the sequester cuts with a grab-bag of other reductions in planned spending and a bunch of increased fees for airline travelers and others.
But the “t” word will go unspoken in this agreement. There will reportedly be no tax hikes in the bargain. But neither will there be a continuation of expiring provisions. And there is no chance they will be extended in any other bill in calendar 2013.
That likely means no action on the “expiring provisions” until after the 2014 elections. That means we might not know whether a bunch of tax breaks we have gotten used to will be extended into 2014 until next December, or maybe even later. A few of the biggies:
- The Section 179 limit on expensing otherwise depreciable property falls to $25,000 next year, from the current $500,000, absent an extender bill.
- 50% bonus depreciation goes away.
- The research credit disappears, as do a bunch of biofuel and wind credits.
- The current five-year “recognition period” for built-in gains in S corporations goes back to ten years, from the current five-year period.
My money is still on an extension of these provisions, effective January 1, 2014, even if enacted later, but my confidence is wavering.
William Perez, Selling Profitable Investments as Part of a Year-End Tax Strategy. “Taxpayers in the two lowest tax brackets of 10% and 15% may especially want to consider selling profitable long-term investments.” Why? Zero taxes on capital gains, as William explains.
Jana Luttenegger, 2014 Mileage Rates (Davis Brown Tax Law Blog)
Jason Dinesen, Philosophical Question About Section 108, Principal Residences and Cancelled Debt “My question is. what if the homeowner moves out before the foreclosure process is complete?”
Russ Fox, Bank Notice on IRS Tax Refund Fraud. “While I salute the IRS (and the banks) for doing something, this effort is equivalent to patching one hole in a roof that has over a hundred leaks.”
Robert D. Flach offers SOME GOOD CONVERSATIONS ON TAX PROFESSIONAL ISSUES
Leslie Book, TEFRA and Affected Items Notices of Deficiency (Procedurally Taxing). “In this post, I will attempt to give readers a map as to how IRS can move from shamming a partnership-based tax shelter to assessing tax against the partner or partners that were attempting to game the system.”
Kyle Pomerleau, High Income Households Paid an Effective Tax Rate 16 times Higher than Low Income Households in 2010 (Tax Policy Blog). He provides more commentary on a recent Congressional Budget Office report (my emphasis):
In 2010, the average effective tax rate for all households was 18.1 percent. This is the average combined effective rate of individual income taxes, social security taxes, corporate income taxes, and excise taxes. The top income quintile paid an average effective tax rate of 24 percent. The lowest quintile had an average effective rate of 1.5 percent. The top quintile’s effective tax rate of 24 percent is 16 times higher than 1.5 percent for those in the lowest quintile.
This is why any federal tax cut “disproportionately benefits the wealthy.” You can only cut taxes for people who pay taxes.
The Critical Question: When Does the Conspiracy End? (Jack Townsend)
News from the Profession: Deloitte Associate Exercises Powers of Persuasion; Scores Firm-Subsidized Xbox One (Going Concern)
Atlanta county gives money to prosperous media company. Cobb County, Future Home of the Atlanta Braves, Strikes Out (Elia Peterson, Tax Policy Blog, my emphasis):
The county is projected to have to finance around $300 million for the development. This includes a one-time $14 million transportation improvement subsidy, a $10 million commitment from the Cumberland Community Improvement District (CID), and payments worth $276 million of a bond issue. The bonds are financed by redirecting funds from two existing taxes (hotel & property taxes) and creating three new revenue sources (a rental car tax, a property tax in the Cumberland CID, and a hotel fee) combined to the tune of $17.9 million annually for the next 30 years.
Liberty Media, the owner of the Braves, despite being a very successful company (owning stakes in SiriusXM, Barnes & Noble, and Time Warner) had their investment subsidized by Cobb County taxpayers. Liberty Media retains most of the rights to the stadium and profits while Cobb County gets next to nothing except the promise of “surefire” economic development (the city won’t even be allowed access to the stadium they built except for special occasions).
Build it and you can’t come!
Tags: Anthony Nitti, corporate welfare, economic development, Elia Peterson, Expiring provisions, extenders, Going Concern, Howard Gleckman, Jack Townsend, Jana Luttenegger, Jason Dinesen, Kay Bell, Kyle Pomerleau, News from the Profession, revenue, Robert D Flach, Russ Fox, TaxGrrrl, The Critical Question, William Perez