Cash basis expansion, permanent Section 179 increase highlight Camp tax reform plan. The GOP House tax leadership has released their tax reform draft, nicely rounded-up by the TaxProf. The plan would lower top individual and corporate rates to 25%, while making big changes in business taxation.
They have released two alternate plans for small business taxation. One plan would tweak S corporation and partnership taxation, making elections easier and easing S corporation penalty taxes. The other draft would do away with the current pass-through regimes and replace them with a single pass-through tax system.
The Camp draft would also greatly expand the availability of cash method accounting:
I’m not sure how I feel about this. I do like getting rid of the special rules for farmers and letting everybody have the same opportunity. I less like the rule giving unlimited cash basis for sole proprietorships, as that would encourage people to keep things on their schedule C for tax reasons even if it is a bad structure otherwise. Do we really need to preserve cash basis for a $100 million schedule C or Schedule F operation? If something is that big, the “simplicity” argument doesn’t make sense.
I’m all for getting rid of the Section 263A stuff.
While I doubt that anything will happen with tax reform this year, there is a real possibility that things will start moving after the 2014 elections.
William McBride, Four Things to Look for in Chairman Camp’s Tax Reform Plan (Tax Policy Blog)
Renu Zaretsky, McConnell Throws Cold Water on Camp’s Tax Plan (TaxVox)
Federal prison sentences were recently handed down to three businessmen by Chief District Judge Fred Biery. The three defendants – John Bean, Pat Mire, and Mike Solis – are going to prison for their roles in a $133 million scheme involving numerous co-conspirators. The FBI and IRS conducted the investigations for the case, which is believed to be the largest criminal tax related case ever prosecuted in western Texas.
Bean and Mire both pled guilty to money laundering and mail fraud conspiracy charges. Solis plead guilty only to a mail fraud conspiracy charge.
The defendants admitted that from 2002 to 2008, they stole more than $133 million from clients of several of the Professional Employer Organizations (PEOs) that they owned and operated.
PEOs actually report client employees as their own, issuing W-2s and filing employment tax returns. The danger of PEOs is that employers have no way to be sure their employment taxes are being deposited. If the PEO is stealing them, the IRS will come back to the employers to collect.
With a non-PEO payroll service, the payroll tax returns are prepared for employers, who issue and sign them. More importantly, non-PEO employers can go online using the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System and verify that their payroll taxes are being paid.
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 293. Among the items in his daily scandal roundup is a Wall Street Journal editorial, Liberals vs. the IRS: Even the Left Doesn’t Want the Tax Man Regulating Speech:
In the Nation magazine, Nan Aron of the liberal judicial lobby the Alliance for Justice writes that 501(c)(4)s aren’t merely groups like Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS, but are “made up of over 86,000 mostly small organizations nationwide” that are active participants in civic life.
“They weren’t invented in the last election cycle; they’ve been around for generations. Their purpose isn’t to hide donors, it’s to advance policies,” Ms. Aron adds. “These groups are involved in elections, because it’s often impossible to advance a policy cause without being involved in the political process.”
There’s no principle that would justify suppressing political rights of 501(c)(4) outfits that can’t apply equally to other exempt outfits. Furthermore, there’s no real reason to impose taxes on political outfits. The answer to speech you don’t like is more speech of your own, not suppressing what you don’t want to hear.
This tax season you may have more to worry about than how much you owe. A new study from Identity Finder finds the IRS is not properly protecting social security numbers in some tax returns…
The research revealed an alarming failure to safeguard sensitive data. Identity Finder uncovered an estimated 630,000 Social Security numbers exposed online in form 990 tax returns.
The most affected group were tax preparers–many of which used their personal SSN rather than their PTIN (preparer tax identification number). However, directors, trustees, employees, donors, and scholarship recipients were all impacted as well.
It’s fair to point out that preparers have some responsibilty — they are often including SSNs unnecessarily, especially their own. But that doesn’t excuse the IRS.
According to UNI officials, more than 20 employees have received “error” messages when filing their individual tax returns online, and their returns were rejected. Others who have yet to file say they called the Internal Revenue Service and found their Social Security numbers had been used. One person reportedly received a refund check at home from the IRS though they hadn’t filed a return yet.
UNI officials are playing down the possibility of identity theft, but that’s how I’d bet. Any organization that collects social security numbers needs to be very careful with them, restricting access and shredding documents on disposal.
Jack Townsend, Stolen Identity Refund Fraud in the News
William Perez, Reporting Social Security Benefits
David Brunori, Great Opportunity for Tax and Public Finance Students (Tax Analysts Blog). “We are conducting our first student writing competition. You should encourage students who have written quality papers to submit them to email@example.com.”