Tax Credits! Is there nothing they can’t do? Bill offering tax credits to rehab abandoned public buildings advances (Jason Noble, Des Moines Register):
House Study Bill 540 adds abandoned public buildings to the list of properties eligible for tax breaks under the state’s Redevelopment Tax Credits program, meaning businesses or nonprofits could obtain state aid for such projects as they currently can on renovations of industrial or commercial properties.
It’s an idea that Gov. Terry Branstad highlighted in his Condition of the State Address last month, and appears to have bipartisan support.
This is a back-door appropriation to help out school districts and local governments, but running it through tax return hides it from those pesky taxpayers who foot the bill. As with Congress, the Iowa General Assembly sees the tax law as the Swiss Army Knife of public policy.
Arnold Kling exposes the vastness of the Right Wing Conspiracy:
The Congressional Budget Office, a Koch-funded organization known to be affiliated with the Tea Party, writes,
CBO estimates that the ACA will reduce the total number of hours worked, on net, by about 1.5 percent to 2.0 percent during the period from 2017 to 2024, almost entirely because workers will choose to supply less labor—given the new taxes and other incentives they will face and the financial benefits some will receive.
A conspiracy so vast…
James Schneider, guest-posting at Econlog, discusses why we pay our taxes in The Sucker Tax:
Imagine a state of anarchy (a lack of government not a house full of boys). An evil genius announces that he will impose a sucker tax. Everyone will be taxed ten dollars, and the proceeds will be redistributed back to all the citizens in equal shares without reference to who paid the tax. In a certain sense, this tax maximizes unfairness. It serves no other purpose than to punish people in direct proportion to how much of the tax they paid. To make tax compliers feel even more ridiculous, the evil genius announces that he will make no effort to punish “tax cheats.” A fair outcome of the game requires that there be no suckers. This will occur if everyone evades the tax. However, it will also occur if everyone pays the tax. Under this scenario, you probably wouldn’t pay the tax (even if you believed in fairness) because you would assume that no one else was going to pay the tax.
Now imagine that the evil genius announces that unless everyone pays the tax one person will be punished.
Read the whole thing. I especially like this: “Compliance does not mean consent.”
Paul Neiffer considers One Possible Section 179 Strategy. A reader asks Paul, “Should I wait to buy section 179 property until the date 179 property is raised from $25,000 to whatever?” He has a way for farmers to plan around the uncertainty.
William Perez, Filing Form 1040A May Help Parents Qualify for the Simplified Needs Test. For college financial aid.
Jason Dinesen asks, Why Doesn’t the IRS Push the EA Designation?:
The IRS already oversees the EA program. There’s no new infrastructure to put in place. No new exams to create. The infrastructure and exams already exist.
Yet throughout the IRS’s ill-fated attempts at creating the “Registered Tax Return Preparer” designation, the IRS rarely mentioned the EA program, except as a side note of “CPAs, EAs and attorneys are exempt from the RTRP testing.”
I think it’s because it would be inconvenient to their efforts to regulate all preparers.
An interesting question about the whole scandal narrative is how it would look if it turned out that many of the groups that the IRS “targeted” were in fact inappropriately claiming 501(c)(4) status. Tea Party Patriots Inc, for example, spends a lot of energy talking about how all those intrusive questions were harassment, but what if it turns that, in fact, all those phone calls that TPP Inc made telling people that November 2012 was the last chance to stop Obamacare from turning the country into a cradle to grave welfare state could be viewed as political?
I think Peter is missing the point. The issue isn’t whether every right-wing group qualified under the standards historically used for 501(c)(4) outfits. It’s whether the rules were selectively enforced against right-side applicants — as seems to be the case. After all, it wouldn’t be OK to examine 1040s of only Republicans even if it turned out some of them were tax cheats.
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 272
David Brunori, Casino Taxes for Horses or Children? (Tax Analysts Blog):
Horse racing has been a dying sport since Nathan Detroit bet on a horse named Paul Revere in Guys and Dolls. In Pennsylvania, the schools are broke. So naturally, when governments need money, they turn to a moribund pastime to pay the bills.
For the children!
William McBride, New CBO Projections Understate the Average Corporate Tax Rate. “Particularly, the CBO is using as their corporate tax base measure domestic economic profits from the BEA, which includes both C and S corporations, even though S corporations are pass-through entities not subject to the corporate tax.” Well, that’s just nuts.
Tax Justice Blog, Gas Tax Remains High on Many States’ Agendas for 2014
Joseph Thorndike, Debt Limit Debates Are Good for Theater, Not For Policy Reform. (Tax Analysts Blog)
Jack Townsesnd, TRAC Posts Statistics on Criminal Tax Enforcement Related to IRS Referrals “[A] surge in IRS criminal investigations referred under Obama has fueled an increase in the number of cases prosecuted.”
Answering the Critical Question: What Kids Peeing in the Pool Can Teach Us About Tax Compliance (Leslie Book, Procedurally Taxing)
News from the Profession: McGladrey Interns Are Busy Learning Their Colleagues Are Boring, How to Use an Ice Cream Truck (Going Concern)
Nice Work, Champ. It’s funny how hard it can be for some people to heed their own good advice. Take this North Carolina man:
Prosecutors said Larry Hill, who coined himself “the people’s champ” for his efforts to keep local children out of trouble, didn’t live by his own message and that his case represented “disturbing hypocrisy.”
In a YouTube clip posted in November 2012, Hill says, “I want all my young people to think before you act. Trouble is too easy to get into, and once you get into trouble, you’ll be all by yourself.”
Federal Judge Earl Britt sentenced Hill to 100 months in prison for conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and 18 months for filing false tax returns.
If it’s any comfort, Mr. Hill will have plenty of company where he’s going. But he will have to get used to a more spartan existence:
The judge agreed to the lower sentence of 100 months but said Hill deserved the “most severe punishment to reflect the seriousness of the offense,” pointing out that Hill used much of the money to buy himself expensive jewelry and cars, including a Maserati. The judge also noted that Hill was on supervised release from an insurance fraud prison term when he committed the tax fraud.
That doesn’t make his advice any less sound:
He should follow it sometime. Russ Fox has more on Mr. Hill.
Tags: tax crime, TaxProf, David Brunori, Arnold Kling, TaxGrrrl, Paul Neiffer, Going Concern, Obamacare, Jack Townsend, Peter Reilly, William McBride, Jason Dinesen, ACA, The Critical Question, IRS disclosure scandal, Tax Justice Blog, Leslie Book, News from the Profession, Jason Noble, James Schneider, Willia Perez