ID Theft may affect 200 University of Northern Iowa employees. KWWL.com reports:
In February, when the issue was first discovered, about 50 people had reported issues filing their federal income taxes. Now, University officials say 200 employees have come forward, and but not all of those are fraud. Still, that has psychology department secretary Jan Cornelius concerned. She said her social security number was stolen.
The problem was identified by taxpayers whose returns were rejected because somebody else had already filed under their numbers. You need to be careful with your Social Security Number, and you should never transmit tax documents as unencrypted email attachments. Use a secure file transfer portal, like Roth & Company’s Filedrop, to send tax files electronically.
More Smidgens. The House Oversight Committee investigating the Tea Party Scandal issued a report yesterday blasting the idea that the IRS stall on right-side 501(c)(4) groups was just a non-political coincidence involving bumblers in Cincinnati. Using IRS documents and e-mails, the report paints a picture of an effort driven by a highly-political bureaucrat to “do something” through IRS regulation to administratively reverse the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. From the report’s conclusion:
Evidence indicates Lerner and her Exempt Organizations unit took a three pronged approach to “do something about it” to “fix the problem”of nonprofit political speech:
1) Scrutiny of new applicants for tax – exempt status (which began as Tea Party targeting);
2) Plans to scrutinize organizations, like those supported by the “Koch Brothers,” that were already acting as 501(c)(4) organizations; and
3)“[O]ff plan” efforts to write new rules cracking down on political activity to replace those that had been in place since 1959. Even without her full testimony, and despite the fact that the IRS has still not turned over many of her e-mails, a political agenda to crack down on tax-exempt organizations comes into focus. Lerner believed the political participation of tax-exempt organizations harmed Democratic candidates, she believed something needed to be done, and she directed action from her unit at the IRS. Compounding the egregiousness of the inappropriate actions, Lerner’s own e-mails showed recognition that she would need to be “cautious” so it would not be a “per se political project.”
Committee Democrats continue to insist that there is no “political motivation,” and no evidence of White House involvement. To deny that targeting “Tea Party” and “Koch-funded” organizations is political is to insult our intelligence. As far as White House involvement, the Chicago Way isn’t for the Boss to pick up the phone and call the Cincinnati service center. The President’s public in-your-face criticism of the Supreme Court for Citizens United at a State-of-the-Union address gave his supporters in the bureaucracy all the guidance they needed.
The TaxProf has a roundup.
Russ Fox, The Moral Climate may have Changed but the Law Hasn’t. “Thus, until Congress changes the law a professional gambler cannot deduct gambling losses in excess of wins.”
Kay Bell, Beware tax break bait and switch. “Yes, gifts to your favorite charity can be deducted, but only if you itemize on Schedule A.”
Paul Neiffer, Permanent Means Permanent:
North Dakota law regarding easements is unique. It appears to be the only state in the country that limits easements to 99 years by law. Since the Tax Code requires that the conservation easement be of a permanent nature, the Tax Court ruled in favor of the IRS and disallowed all of the easement charitable donations.
Oops. Still, I think anything “permanent” should be looked at skeptically. Nobody knows whether it will seem wise to lock up a parcel 100 years from now.
David Brunori, Where Is the Outrage? (Tax Analysts Blog):
According to Good Jobs First, there are 514 economic development programs in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. More than 245,000 awards have been granted under those programs. I ask again, where is the outrage? The system is antithetical to the idea of free markets. A quarter of a million times, state governments decided what is best for producers and consumers. That should make us cringe. First, the government is inefficient at providing public goods, and it is terrible at manipulating the markets for private goods. But more importantly, those 514 economic development programs are almost all the result of insidious cronyism. Narrow business interests manipulate government policymakers, and those interests prosper to the detriment of everyone else. Free markets be damned.
And while I’m looking for outrage, where are the liberals? The 965 companies in the report received over $110 billion of public money. Berkshire Hathaway, a company with $485 billion in assets and $20 billion in profits, received over $1 billion of that money. Its chair, William Buffett, is worth about $58 billion. Buffet, by the way, is still a darling of the left. He has some nerve to call for higher taxes. The billion dollars his companies took would pay for a lot of teachers, healthcare, and other public goods.
They take just a little bit at a time from all of us so we don’t notice, and they give it in big chunks to their well-connected friends, who certainly do notice. The report David refers to is here.
Joseph Henchman, State Sales Tax Jurisdictions Approach 10,000 (Tax Policy Blog). Small wonder online sellers don’t want to collect everyone’s sales tax.
Elaine Maag, The Many Moving Parts of Camp’s Tax Reform for Low-Income Families (TaxVox)
Joseph Thorndike, The Last Time Everyone Gave Up on Tax Reform, It Actually Happened (Tax Analysts Blog). But not this time:
Ultimately, Reagan agreed to make tax reform a priority. And his support was crucial. No lawmaker, no matter how exalted, well intentioned, or energetic, can move the ball like a president.
Which is one very important reason why 2014 is different from 1984. President Obama has no discernible interest in fundamental tax reform. So conventional wisdom is right: The Camp tax plan is going nowhere fast.
I think that’s right.
All it needs is a little pasta and fresh lemon. Argentina: Authorities investigate tax evasion via garlic exports through shell companies
Career Corner. It Is Almost Certain You Will One Day Be Replaced by Machines (Going Concern).
Tags: economic development, corporate welfare, Kay Bell, Russ Fox, David Brunori, Joseph Thorndike, TaxGrrrl, Paul Neiffer, Going Concern, Good Jobs First, Joseph Henchman, Anthony Nitti, Elaine Maag, IRS disclosure scandal, Lois Lerner, Career Corner