IRS stats show more people are preparing their own returns, reports Tax Analysts ($link):
The IRS’s latest data, released April 11, show electronic filing from paid tax professionals fell 0.3 percent from the same time last year. That follows a 1.8 percent drop in April 2013, and a 1.7 percent drop in April 2012. By contrast, the IRS said, self-prepared e-filing of returns rose 4.5 percent through April 11 compared with last year, 3.1 percent in April 2013, and 5 percent in April 2012.
It seems like an odd trend. It’s not like the tax law is getting any easier. One possibility raised in the story is that it’s those wacky youngsters:
Self-preparation may be a response to a younger generation’s ease with computers and software, said [retired Enrolled Agent Sandra] Martin. “That’s more of a permanent reason why people aren’t using preparers,” she said.
She also raises a much less logical possibility:
Martin said the IRS’s inability to regulate return preparers makes matters worse. Taxpayers are not only uncertain about the qualifications of their preparers, she said; some are afraid, haunted by stories of fraudulent preparers ripping off return filers and deciding the do-it-yourself path may be safest.
I think the failed IRS preparer regulation power grab is a big part of the cause, but not for the reasons cited by Ms. Martin. As Dan Alban, slayer of the preparer regulations, testified before the U.S. Senate taxwriting committee:
In fact, IRS data released last summer shows a dramatic drop in the number of tax preparers in recent years — a sudden loss of more than 200,000 preparers from 2010 to 2012 — following the recent imposition of a series of burdensome IRS regulations on preparers (the e – file mandate and the Return Preparer Initiative, which included both the PTIN registration requirement and RTRP licensing)
If your preparer gets out of the business, maybe you will stop using a preparer. With fewer preparers, the law of supply and demand predicts that costs will rise. As costs rise, consumers seek substitutes. It’s what I predicted back in 2010:
Rather than pay the increased costs, some taxpayers will stop getting help on their returns altogether and either self-prepare or drop out of the system. These dropouts certainly won’t see improved service, though the regulators will never admit responsibility for that.
Supply and demand: it’s not just a good idea, it’s the law!
The colors on the map get darker as the rates get higher. You’ll notice that Iowa’s 8.98% top rate gives it quite the purple tan. It’s misleading, in that the effective rate is closer to 6% taking deductiblility of federal taxes into account; that would give Iowa a more lovely lavender tint, like Missouri and Louisiana. Yet Iowa refuses to build the federal deductibility into lower rates. The Tax Update’s Quick and Dirty Iowa Tax Reform Plan would address that.
Christopher Bergin, The IRS and the Tax System: Integrity and Fairness for Whom? (Tax Analysts Blog):
The IRS’s mission statement couldn’t be clearer:
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and enforce the law with integrity and fairness to all.
If some of the tax cops aren’t playing by the rules – and getting bonuses for it – how does that provide us taxpayers “top quality service” and help us understand and meet our tax responsibilities? The two most important words in this mission statement are “integrity” and “fairness.” The one thing largely missing from our tax code is fairness. And the one thing now beginning to disappear from the agency charged with administering that tax code is integrity.
Nah. Compliance is for the peons, not the overlords.
Len, the director of Tax Policy Center (and, thus, my boss), argues that a dedicated—and fully transparent–health care VAT would increase public support for efforts to slow the growth of medical costs. That’s because the VAT would rise, for all to see, with increases in government health spending.
I have another idea: let’s sever the link between employment and healthcare, authorize interstate sales of high-deductible health insurance, and have people pay for routine care out-of-pocket. We don’t have to resort to a VAT to keep prices down for, say, beer and groceries — or for non-covered health costs, like LASIX procedures. Removing the layers between consumer and payment just might work for other health costs too. Seeing increase in your spending from your own pocketbook is a lot better motivator to reduce costs than watching government budget numbers.
Gene Steurle, Dave Camp’s Tax Reform Could Kill Community Foundations:
The proposal would effectively eliminate most donor advised funds (DAFs), the major source of revenues to community foundations, so they could no longer provide long-term support for local and regional charitable activities. Instead, those funds would need to pay out all their assets over a period of five years.
Iowa has a special tax credit for gifts to community foundations, which is often oversubscribed.
Or anybody else. Piketty’s Tax Hikes Won’t Help the Middle Class (Megan McArdle)
Tax Justice Blog, Trend Toward Higher Gas Taxes Continues in the States‘
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 351
Robert D. Flach brings the Friday Buzz!
Going Concern, Now We’re Creatively Interpreting Sarbanes-Oxley to Include Fish. Well, the whole thing has always been fishy.
Keith Fogg, Collection of Restitution Payments by the IRS (Procedurally Taxing)
Tags: TaxProf, Kay Bell, Christopher Bergin, TaxGrrrl, preparer regulation, Joseph Henchman, Howard Gleckman, Quick and Dirty Iowa Tax Reform Plan, Gene Steurle, Dan Alban, Tax Justice Blog, Lyman Stone, Richard Borean, Keith Fogg.