Iowa 1040s are due today! If you are 90% paid in, they extend automatically with no filing. If you need more time and need to pay in something, use IA 1040-V.
House votes to make permanent six “expiring” provisions. The House Ways and Means Committee voted to permanently extend six of the perpetually-expiring tax breaks that Congress renews every year or two. They include:
- A simplified version of the research credit
- The five-year built-in gain tax recognition period for S corporations
- The $500,000 Section 179 deduction limit
- A provision reducing the net basis reduction for S corporation donations of appreciated property to the basis of the property.
The committee also voted for two international extenders.
The votes were mostly along party lines, which means they are unlikely to be passed in this form by the Democratic-controlled Senate. The Senate Finance Committee has already approved its own temporary extender package, and my guess is the final extenders package will look like the Finance Committee bill.
Tax Analysts reports ($link) that the committee isn’t done with extenders, but it isn’t clear when it will look at Bonus Depreciation.
The “no” votes for the House package objected to the lack of offsets to the revenue “lost” by the package. I’m less upset. While I oppose the research credit on principle, these provisions are permanent anyway; the whole “extender” process is a sham, conducted only to pretend that the tax breaks aren’t permanent so they “cost” less under Congressional accounting rules. It’s the sort of thing that would be a felony in the private sector, but just another day for our leaders. At least the House bill drops the pretense that these things won’t get passed every time they expire.
Additional coverage available at Accounting Today.
Clint Stretch, Dreams of Tax Reform (Tax Analysts Blog)
No gas tax boost this year. Sioux City Journal reports that a last-gasp attempt to boost Iowa gasoline taxes died last night as the General Assembly continues its pre-adjournment frenzy.
David Brunori, Sad Pragmatism and Tax Incentives (Tax Analysts Blog). “If tax incentives are an unavoidable reality, we should make them as transparent and accountable as possible.” True, but that doesn’t excuse the politicians who take your money and give it to their special friends.
The Iowa State University Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation has released its 2014 summer seminar schedule. It includes a slate of webinars on topics from Ethics to ACA mandates. There will also be two big out-of-town events, in West Baden Springs, Indiana, and West Yellowstone, Montana. I’m not able to participate this year, but they are a hoot and a great learning experience.
TaxGrrl, Widow Loses House Over $6.30 Tax Bill. “A Pennsylvania woman has lost her home for little more than the cost of a Starbucks Frappuccino.” The law in all its majesty.
Peter Reilly, Graduation Contingency Kills Alimony Deduction. It’s very easy to screw up an alimony deduction with bells and whistles, as Peter explains.
Jason Dinesen, Preparer Regulation and Judging Preparers Based on Size of Refund. “Anyone who’s worked in this business has experienced the irate client who thinks the preparer screwed up because their refund was less than their friend/co-worker/hair dresser, etc.”
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 356
Jack Townsend, U.S. Congressman Indicted for Tax Related Crime
Joseph Thorndike, Airlines Say Ticket Taxes Would Be More Visible if They Were Better Hidden (Tax Analysts Blog)
Alan Cole, What Gift Cards Can Teach Us About Tax Policy (Tax Policy Blog)
Renu Zaretsky, Funding Tax Breaks, the IRS, and Public Pensions, Safety, and Schools. The TaxVox headline roundup.
News from the Profession. EY Is Tackling the Important Issue of Dudes’ Need for Flexibility (Going Concern)
Clear error is a standard used by appellate courts to review some lower court decisions. A Tax Court case decided by Judge Paris dealing with horse losses yesterday involved purported destruction of records by an old girlfriend. Here’s where the clear error comes in:
The wrath of a former girlfriend may be a formidable force, but it is not analogous to a hurricane-like natural disaster, and it does not constitute a reasonable cause outside petitioner’s control.
I’ve met Judge Paris, and I strongly suspect she’s never dealt with a bitter former girlfriend. Anyone who has would never have written such a thing. But as she pointed out that the petitioner provided no evidence that such destruction occurred, so you oughta know that the case probably still is on solid ground.
Tags: TaxProf, tax court, Kay Bell, David Brunori, Expiring provisions, Joseph Thorndike, Going Concern, extenders, Jack Townsend, ISU-CALT, Peter Reilly, Judge Paris, Jason Dinesen, Tax Justice Blog, Alan Cole, News from the Profession