Mail your second quarter 1040 and 1041 estimates today! (Or pay them online).
If the IRS demanded your emails, and you said the computer “crashed” and ate them, they’d buy that, right?
The IRS expects us to believe that they so monumentally incompetent at information technology that they can’t produce Lois Lerner’s emails from January 2009 through April 2011. No backups? No RAID duplication? No way to reconstruct them out of the bad hard drive?
Even the best possible interpretation of this — taking the IRS at its word — is a damning indictment of the agency. It would show that basic network hygiene used by the private sector since the last century still is too advanced for the biggest taxing agency in the world.
But you may be excused for suspecting evil instead of incompetence here. Congressional investigators have been looking for these emails for months. Evidence has been building of an interagency effort between the IRS and the Justice Department to shut down, and even prosecute, unfriendly organizations. Now, suddenly, poof, no more emails. I don’t buy it.
The IRS statement says “In the course of collecting and producing Ms. Lerner’s additional emails, the IRS determined her hard drive crashed in 2011.” What email system does the IRS use where the emails live on individual hard drives, rather than an email server? Do any of you readers use your PC as your email server? If so, do you never back it up?
And if you buy the IRS story, then tell my why on earth this exceptionally inept agency should be responsible for administering the nation’s health insurance system through the ACA. Or even the income tax, for that matter.
Sheryl Attkinson has some follow-up questions for the IRS:
Please provide a timeline of the crash and documentation covering when it was first discovered and by whom; when, how and by whom it was learned that materials were lost; the official documentation reporting the crash and federal data loss; documentation reflecting all attempts to recover the materials; and the remediation records documenting the fix. This material should include the names of all officials and technicians involved, as well as all internal communications about the matter.
Please provide all documents and emails that refer to the crash from the time that it happened through the IRS’ disclosure to Congress Friday that it had occurred.
Please provide the documents that show the computer crash and lost data were appropriately reported to the required entities including any contractor servicing the IRS. If the incident was not reported, please explain why.
Please provide a list summarizing what other data was irretrievably lost in the computer crash. If the loss involved any personal data, was the loss disclosed to those impacted? If not, why?
Please provide documentation reflecting any security analyses done to assess the impact of the crash and lost materials. If such analyses were not performed, why not?
Please provide documentation showing the steps taken to recover the material, and the names of all technicians who attempted the recovery.
Please explain why redundancies required for federal systems were either not used or were not effective in restoring the lost materials, and provide documentation showing how this shortfall has been remediated.
Please provide any documents reflecting an investigation into how the crash resulted in the irretrievable loss of federal data and what factors were found to be responsible for the existence of this situation.
For a phony scandal, it’s amazing how real they’re making it look.
Russ Fox, The Two Year Gap. “Either the IRS is deliberately lying or they have the worst IT department and policies of any company, organization, or government entity in the world.”
Ron Fournier, Did The IRS Really Lose Lois Lerner’s Emails? Let a Special Prosecutor Find Them. “The announcement came late Friday, a too-cute-by-half cliche of a PR strategy to mitigate backlash. ‘The IRS told Congress it cannot locate many of Lois Lerner’s emails prior to 2011 because her computer crashed during the summer of that year,’ The Associated Press reported.”
Althouse, “Did The IRS Really Lose Lois Lerner’s Emails? Let a Special Prosecutor Find Them.” “Give us a special prosecutor, because it’s not acceptable to tell us we’re supposed to believe this story of disappearing evidence….”
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 403, rounding up blog and big-media coverage.
Peter Reilly, Personal Goodwill Avoids Corporate Tax Exposure:
The IRS does not like the concept of “personal goodwill”, but courts have often approved it. In the Tax Court decision in the case of Bross Trucking, the concept was confirmed again, helping to save the taxpayer from what appears to me to be a real overreach on the part of the IRS.
An interesting case involving a group of family businesses.
Phil Hodgen, Maximum account value determination for trust beneficiaries for FinCen Form 114. Useful information ahead of the June 30 FBAR deadline.
Andy Grewal, TEFRA Jurisdiction and Sham Partnerships — Again? (Procedurally Taxing). A guest post by a University of Iowa law prof.
Howard Gleckman, The Strange Fruit of the House’s Bonus Depreciation Bill (TaxVox). “If I had read the bill more carefully, I would have noticed that while it applied to fruit that grows on trees and vines, it inexplicably excluded fruit that grows on bushes. As a blueberry lover, I am shocked and outraged.”
TaxGrrrl, House Votes To Make Small Business Tax Break Permanent. “The bill would make the [$500,000] cap retroactive to January 1, 2014.”
Scott Drenkard, Donald Sterling Might Not Be Able to Write Off $2.5 Million Fine as a Business Expense (Tax Policy Blog).
Going Concern, What’s a Day in the Life of a Typical Audit Intern? You’ve been dying to know!
Tags: Althouse, Andy Grewal, Going Concern, Howard Gleckman, IRS disclosure scandal, Jack Townsend, Kay Bell, Peter Reilly, Phil Hodgen, Robert D Flach, Ron Fournier, Russ Fox, Scott Drenkard, Sheryl Attkinson, TaxGrrrl, TaxProf