The IRS scandal finally found a way to get the Des Moines Register’s attention. Lois Lerner of IRS sought audit of Grassley, emails say:
The emails show Lerner mistakenly received an invitation to an event that was meant to go to Grassley, a Republican.
The event organizer apparently offered to pay for Grassley’s wife to attend the event.
Instead of forwarding the invitation to Grassley’s office, Lerner emailed another IRS official to suggest referring the matter for an audit, saying it might be inappropriate for the group to pay for his wife.
“Perhaps we should refer to exam?” Lerner wrote.
It was unclear from the emails whether Lerner was suggesting that Grassley or the group be audited — or both.
A reader who relies on the Des Moines Register for news might be puzzled over who Lois Lerner is. A search of the word “Lerner” on the Register’s website only uncovers two other stories related to her role in the scandal: “Steve King calls for abolishing the IRS on Tax Day” (4/15/14) and “Critics: Progress scant after IRS scandal” (3/27/13). It appears that today’s article would have been the first time Register readers would have learned anything about the mysterious mass deletion of emails relating to the Tea Party scandal. A devoted Register fan might have been puzzled as to why this seemingly important news hadn’t been mentioned before.
I think there’s a hint down in the article (my emphasis):
Lerner headed the IRS division that processes applications for tax-exempt status. The IRS has acknowledged that agents improperly scrutinized applications by tea party and other conservative groups before the 2010 and 2012 elections. Documents show that some liberal groups were singled out, too.
Nobody buys that last sentence. While a few “liberal” words were on the list of buzzwords to identify political organizations, no liberal outfits had their donor lists illegally released, or had their exemption applications held up indefinitely with demands for ridiculous detail of the organizations — including the content of their prayers. Here are the stats:
Now maybe the Register will begin to get its readers up to speed. If not, the Tax Update is available to Register subscribers at no extra charge!
Meanwhile, the IRS will have to explain to senior Senate taxwriter Grassley just why it needs more resources. That may be slightly awkward.
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 413
Russ Fox, Lerner Appears to Have Targeted Iowa Senator Grassley “Of course, President Obama said earlier this year just that–that there is not even a smidgen of corruption…”
The Tax Fairy fails a true believer. Paul Daugerdas, the Jenkens & Gilchrist attorney who generated over $90 million in fees selling tax shelters, was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison yesterday for his troubles. Bloomberg reports:
The tax shelters at the center of the case were sold from 1994 to 2004 to almost 1,000 people, creating $7 billion in fraudulent tax deductions and more than $1 billion in phony losses for customers, the U.S. said.
It appears unlikely that Mr. Daugerdas will come out ahead on his tax shelter efforts:
Daugerdas was ordered to forfeit $164.7 million and help pay restitution, with other conspirators, of $371 million.
While he wasn’t the only Tax Fairy guide during the great turn-of-the-century Tax Shelter frenzy, he was perhaps the most prominent, inventing tax shelters with names like HOMER and COBRA. The shelters found eager customers among businesses and individuals looking for the Tax Fairy, the legendary sprite believers insist will wave her magic wand and make taxes go away, for a very reasonable fee. Now Jenkens & Gilchrist is dead, the believers are out their money, plus penalties, and there still is no Tax Fairy.
The Tax Analysts story on the sentencing ($link) had one item that I hadn’t seen before: “The jurors said that Daugerdas was convicted solely on counts for which the government presented evidence of backdating, when Daugerdas agreed to prepare false tax returns that reported as 2001 losses transactions that occurred in 2002, the defense memo says.” Way back in 2009, I said this could be his biggest problem at trial: Is backdating the fatal flaw for Daugerdas?:
If the government can prove backdating, it might be much easier for a juror to vote for conviction. Tax is hard, and a good defense lawyer has a lot of opportunities to give jurors a reasonable doubt in a case involving short sales, derivatives and currency options. But anybody can understand backdating.
This sort of thing separates “aggressive tax planning” from plain fraud.
Jack Townsend, Daugerdas Gets 15 Year Sentence
This one is probably coincidental, but Jason Dinesen, 138 Years Ago Today: Custer’s Last Stand
Robert D. Flach, A SUMMER TAX TIP FOR SCHEDULE C FILERS
William Perez, Single Filing Status. “A person is considered unmarried for tax related purposes if on the last day of the year the person is not married to any other person or is legally separated from a spouse under a divorce or separate maintenance decree.”
Cara Griffith, Ohio Enacts Legislation Allowing Creation of Captive Insurance Companies (Tax Analysts Blog).
The answer is clearly more tax credits. The New Jersey Casino That Tax Credits Could Not Save (Adam Michel, Tyler Dennis, Joseph Henchman, Tax Policy Blog)
Renu Zaretsky, Expanding a Credit, Simplifying a Break, and Cutting Off a Nose to Spite a Face. Today’s TaxVox headline roundup covers IRS funding, student debt, and same-sex marriage complications.