Tax Roundup, 2/23/16: Governor Branstad reverses stand, now supports Section 179 and other extenders.

February 23rd, 2016 by Joe Kristan

coupling20160213Found money. Governor Branstad started out this legislative session saying the state couldn’t afford the $500,000 Section 179 deduction ever again. He also said the state couldn’t afford to couple to any other 2015 federal tax “extenders.”

Never mind.

The Governor’s office confirmed yesterday that it has decided to support the House-passed coupling bill, HF 2092. The House bill conforms to all 2015 federal extenders, including a permanent $500,000 Section 179 deduction. The Section 179 deduction allows taxpayers to deduct in the year of purchase equipment costs that would otherwise be capitalized and deducted over a period of years through depreciation.

The fate of the extender bill now is in the hands of Senate Majority Leader Gronstal, who controls which bills can come to a vote in the Democrat-controlled chamber. Sen. Gronstal and chief Senate taxwriter Joe Bolckom have announced their support for the Governor’s now-abandoned anti-coupling position. That means they now have a bargaining chip. From O. Kay Henderson:

Senator Mike Gronstal of Council Bluffs, the top Democrat in the legislature, said Senate Democrats are willing to pass these tax cuts, if Republicans are willing to adjust tax policy elsewhere. Gronstal suggested doing away with the $40 million tax break the Branstad Administration unilaterally gave manufacturers.

So now it’s a hostage negotiation.

The Governor’s office hasn’t said where he found the funding for the extenders on his road to Damascus, reports The Des Moines Register:

Spokesman Ben Hammes said in an email Monday that the governor now supports the bill, “given we can still fund the budget priorities of Iowans.” Hammes did not respond to direct questions about how Branstad would calculate the budget differently without funding concerns.

20151118-1I like to think that the Governor’s budget math was altered by a rebellion of his partisans in the General Assembly. Every Republican who voted on the House bill voted against the Governor’s position, and their minority contingent in the Senate would likely do the same thing.

While Section 179 is the biggest revenue item in the extender package, there are a number of other 2015 tax breaks at stake, including:

Exclusion for IRA contributions to charity
Exclusion of gain from qualified small business stock
Basis adjustment for S corporation charitable contributions
Built-in gain tax five-year recognition period
Educator expense deduction
Exclusion of home mortgage debt forgiveness
Qualified tuition deduction
Conservation easement deductions
Deduction for food inventory contributions

The Department of Revenue has warned taxpayers that they have no authority to claim these breaks until the legislature acts. The Department has so far provided no guidance so far on how to report some of these items, such as the exclusion for IRA charitable distributions.

I think the prospects for eventual Senate passage, which appeared bleak as recently as Friday, now are favorable. House Democrats also voted in favor of the House bill, 26-14. There is no reason to believe Senate Democrats feel differently. So while Sen. Gronstal can be expected to extract concessions, probably in spending priorities, he probably is under some pressure from his own caucus to move the bill. I don’t expect the Governor to surrender the manufacturing sales tax exclusion in any deal.

If the Governor and the legislature need to find some revenue to help make it up, I have a handy list of revenue ideas for them.

Related: Prior Tax Update Coverage.

 

20151124-2

 

TaxGrrrl, Presidential Campaign Spending & That Checkbox On Your Tax Return, “In 2007, less than 10% of taxpayers checked the box and in 2013, only about 6% of taxpayers checked the box.”

Robert Wood, Dear IRS: Like Apple And Google, I’m Offshore For Taxes. Moving money offshore for taxes isn’t very practical, despite what some people who want to harass people with non-U.S. holdings even more seem to think.

Keith Fogg, Calculating Interest When the IRS Makes a Restitution Based Assessment (Procedurally Taxing)

Peter Reilly, IRS Rules Bingo Is For Charities Not A Charity In Itself. “Somehow I had managed to get through over 35 years of tax practice without realizing a portion of the Internal Revenue Code is dedicated to bingo –  Section 513(f) – Certain bingo games.”

Jason Dinesen, Glossary: Balance Sheet. “A balance sheet is a summary of a business’s assets, liabilities and equity.”

Kay Bell, 9 states considering gasoline tax hikes

Jack Townsend, NPR Planet Money Podcast on a Tax Protestor. “The show goes through basic tax and criminal law related to tax protestors / deniers.”

Paul Neiffer, If You Don’t Pay Income Taxes, You Lose the Farm! “It is almost always best to pay your taxes when they are due; otherwise you may end up losing the farm, just like Mr. Sanders.”

 

20151209-2

 

TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 1020. IRS continues to hold up Tea Party exemption applications. 1020 days later.

Scott Greenberg, Who Itemizes Deductions? (Tax Policy Blog). “When it comes to households with incomes over $75,000, a significant majority itemizes deductions:”

Jeremy Scott, A ‘Brexit’ Would Mean More if Labour Were In Power (Tax Analysts Blog). “It’s hard to know exactly what a post-exit United Kingdom would look like because neither political party has spelled out what leaving the EU would mean. But there would probably be much more continuity on the tax side than in other important financial areas — that is, unless the Conservative government fell as a result of the referendum and Labour took its place.”

Renu ZaretskyA Budget, Carbon, Fuel, the Environment… and a Revolt. Today’s TaxVox headline roundup covers a putative House GOP budget deal, carbon taxes, and gas tax hikes by the states.

 

Caleb Newquist, A Short List of Things Donald Trump Has Said About Releasing His Tax Returns (Going Concern). The list doesn’t include anything about, “they will be awesome,” but “they will be very good.”

xx

 

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,