Tax Roundup, 2/26/16: Gronstal hints at approach to Section 179 coupling deal. And: Yes he can! (Release his returns)

February 26th, 2016 by Joe Kristan

couplingInteresting, if true. In opening hostage negotiations over the fate of Section 179 coupling, Iowa Senate Majority Leader Gronstal may have hinted at a “Main Street vs. Walnut Street” approach. From wcfcourier.com:

If the choice is between offering tax relief to a limited number of manufacturers “or taking care of 30,000 farmers, 25,000 small businesses,” Gronstal said he would “gravitate more toward the 50,000 or 60,000 effort to help those folks (rather) than something that is much more narrow in terms of its impact.”

I say “may have” because I think he is hinting at trying to get the Governor to reverse its regulatory change to sales tax rules on manufacturing supplies.

By “Walnut Street,” I refer to downtown Des Moines, where several of the big law/lobbying firms in town have their offices (Nothing against Walnut Street — that’s where Tax Update World Headquarters is located, too).  Whether or not Sen. Gronstal realizes it, the coupling issue is ultimately about whether to benefit a handful of insiders and big companies benefitting from special tax benefits, or whether to further the interests of the rest of the taxpayers who pay for any special deals.

The revenue cost from adopting the $500,000 Section 179 limit for Iowa is estimated around $90 million. Eight taxpayers by themselves claimed $35 million in research credits in 2015, of which around $30 million were paid to the companies in cash because they exceed the claimants income tax bills. Just last week the state promised $15 million to DuPont as a location incentive. The potential loss of Section 179 deduction is making its many beneficiaries suspicious of the multi-million dollar “economic development” tax credits that benefit relatively few insiders with lobbyists.

Walnut Street back in the day.

Walnut Street back in the day.

While Senator Gronstal will insist on concessions for passing the bill, I expect he will reach a deal without insisting on his full pound of flesh. More than anything else, he wants to remain Majority Leader, with control over whether legislation lives or dies. He has only 26-24 control of the Senate. If he is perceived as blocking coupling, it may be just enough to tip a close race or two against his party. I think his reference to the “50,000 or 60,000” shows he’s aware of this. That’s why I think an agreement to couple with the federal limit is now likely in the next two or three weeks. I have no insider information to confirm this guess.

Related: Me, Tax season impasse: why your 2015 Iowa tax return may be on hold. My new post at IowaBiz.com, the Des Moines Business Record Business Professional’s Blog.

Other coverage: Des Moines Register, Gronstal opens door to Iowa tax-coupling deal

 

Yes he can! Trump says he can’t release tax returns because he’s being audited (marketwatch.com). That’s not true, of course. While it’s illegal to release someone else’s returns without their permission, you can make your own returns public any time. The IRS doesn’t make you sign some sort of confidentiality agreement when they audit you.

Like every other silly thing he says, this probably will probably increase his standing in the polls.

Related: TaxGrrrl, Trump Won’t Release Tax Returns, Citing IRS Audit: Is It A Legitimate Excuse? “Trump could absolutely release those returns now – even in the middle of an audit.”

 

20150401-2

 

Tony Nitti, Beachbody Coach? Rodan & Fields Consultant? At Tax Time, Beware The Hobby Loss Rules. “If your Facebook feed is anything like mine, videos of clumsy toddlers and unlikely animal pals have recently given way to a relentless string of friends pushing side businesses.”

Kay Bell, Penalty for late tax filing increases in 2017. “Starting in 2017, if you send in your Form 1040 (and additional forms and schedules) more than two months after the return is due, you’ll be slapped with a penalty of $205 or 100 percent of your due tax, whichever amount is smaller.” Another example of the ugly practice of funding the government through penalties instead of taxes.

Keith Fogg, Discharging the Failure to File Penalty in Bankruptcy (Procedurally Taxing).

Somehow I missed this: WHAT’S THE BUZZ, TELL ME WHAT’S A HAPPENNIN’ – SPECIAL TAX SEASON EDITION (Robert D. Flach). “An unprecedented tax season BUZZ!  Some good stuff that needs to be spread around now – and could not wait until April.”

Andrew Mitchel, Charts of Examples in Rev. Proc. 91-55: Form 5472 & Direct and Ultimate Indirect 25% Shareholders. A big issue when you have foreign owners of a U.S. corporation.

Robert Wood, Kanye West Could Still Get $1 Billion Tax Free. Why?

Jim Maule, Section 280A and the Tree House. “The reader asked, ‘Can a tree house qualify under the Section 280A rules? Can a tree house be depreciated?’ Though there’s no direct authority, careful reading of the applicable statute provides an answer.”

Party on Walnut Street.

Party on Walnut Street.

 

TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 1023

Renu Zaretsky, Times get taxing for candidates… Today’s TaxVox headline roundup covers last night’s debate, candidate tax returns, and the lost credibility of the IRS under Shulman and Koskinen.

 

News from the Profession. Password Inundation: Password Policies We Love to Hate (Megan Lewczyk, Going Concern).

 

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,