Posts Tagged ‘Brian Gongol’

Tax Roundup, 12/26/2013: Tax loss harvest time! And: people like you to give them money.

Thursday, December 26th, 2013 by Joe Kristan


harvest
Harvest those tax losses.  
Just as millions of disappointed gift recipients rush the retailers to improve on Santa today, investors can get busy over the next few days trying to make the best of their own disappointments.  They can cash out losses on disappointing investments to shelter their 2013 gains.  Some tips to make sure you do it right:

- You have to take the loss in a taxable account. A loss in an IRA or 401(k) plan doesn’t help you.

- Normally the “trade date” is the effective date for tax purposes, so you can sell a stock as late as December 31 this year and still deduct the loss on your 2009 1040.

- If you have a loss on a short sale, the tax law treats it as closing on the settlement date, not the trade date, so you can’t wait to the last minute to close a short sale to get a deduction.

- You don’t need to overdo it.  You can deduct your capital losses only to the extent of your capital gains, plus $3000.  But if you do overdo it, individual capital losses carry forward indefinitely.

- Harvesting losses helps taxpayers subject to the Obamacare/ACA Net Investment Income Tax to the extent it helps for regular taxes.

- Watch out for the wash sale rules. If you buy the same stock within the 30 days preceding or following the sale of a loss stock, your loss is disallowed. This is true even if you sell from a taxable account and buy in an IRA, according to the IRS.

Come back tomorrow for another 2013 year-end tax tip!

 

Paul Neiffer offers Some Quick Year-End Tax Tips

 

20120906-1Give away money and folks will line up.State tax credit program hits a big bump: It’s out of money, and that’s a good sign,”  reports the Des Moines Business Record:

Economic development officials in Des Moines and other Iowa cities have been told to stop sending requests for a state economic development tax credit. The reason: The fund is tapped out.

Greater Des Moines developers were told during a meeting last week with officials from the Iowa Economic Development Authority and the city of Des Moines that a tax credit program used to provide gap financing for multimillion-dollar developments has reached its $3 million annual cap on the ability to transfer the credits, a key element in financing the projects.

“Transferable” tax credits are actually subsidies. It is economically identical to giving the developers a license to factor the state’s receivables at a small discount.

Local developers, the Greater Des Moines Partnership, and state officials will press the Iowa Legislature to at least raise the $3 million cap and make adjustments that could eliminate the ranking system.

So people who want the state to give them more of our money and the state officials that give away our money want the legislature to make it easier to give away our money. What could go wrong?

 

Speaking of the people giving away our money,  State-owned Honey Creek Resort near Moravia continues to struggle financially.  (thegazette.com, via Gongol) What madness led the government to open a resort?  Maybe the same madness that makes people think the government should be allocating investment capital.

 

tf logoJoseph Henchman, Tax Foundation Wins State Tax Notes Honor, Third Year Running:

For three years running now, we have been honored as most influential in state tax policy by State Tax Notes (subscription req’d). This year, they present it as an unranked list of ten recipients. The list is five state officials, three lawyers, one legislator, and us…

Given the response of the Iowa legislature to my suggestions, I am sure that I rank among the ten least influential in state tax policy.  I wonder if there’s a prize for that?

 

Howard Gleckman,  TheTaxVox 2013 Lump of Coal Award: Wait ‘Til Next Year Edition.  He doesn’t think the Tea Party scandal was more than “merely bungling the job on a bipartisan basis.”  Given the overwhelming attention paid to the right, that’s an unsupported statement.   Mr. Gleckman is a man of the center-left; when it’s your opponents being targeted, it’s easier to conclude that it’s all fair.

 

Tony Nitti, Tax Geek Tuesday: When Structuring The Sale Of Your Business Goes Wrong   Tony addresses the related-party debacle of Fish v. Commissioner, where a Kansas City taxpayer generated $9 million in ordinary income when he thought he was going to have capital gains, because a partial cash-out of his business worked out to be a sale of goodwill to a related party.

Margaret Van Houten,  Do My Estate Planning Documents Need to Have Special Language to Deal with My Digital Assets?  (Davis Brown Tax Law Blog)

Russ Fox, Nominations Due for 2013 Tax Offender of the Year.  Sadly, Russ will have plenty of worthy candidates.

 

TreeTreetreetreetreePeter Reilly offers Kind Christmas Wishes To Those Behind Bars And The Tax Collectors Too  “So when you think treeabout it, you realize that one of the reasons that Jesus was born in Bethlehem was that Joseph and Mary were tax compliant.”

Kay Bell, The Christmas tax story

Jason Dinesen, Greatest Hits: Deducting Mileage from a Home Office   

TaxProf, World Giving Index 2013: U.S. Is #1

Me, What’s new in year-end tax planning, my new post at IowaBiz.com, the Des Moines Business Record’s Business Professionals’ Blog.

Career Corner. How to Choose Between Two Big 4 Offers When You Have No Clue What Either Involves (Going Concern)

 

TaxGrrrl, The True Cost Of Christmas: Santa’s Tax Bill:

Compensation is taxed to the elves as income – but Santa has taxes to pay on their behalf. Payroll taxes – at the employer contribution rate of 7.65% – for the elves work out to $1,890,927.

Santa doesn’t pay income taxes on compensation paid to the elves but he does have to manage their withholding according to any forms W-4 provided to him. Fortunately for Santa, there is no withholding requirement for state taxes in Alaska. 

I would argue the residency issue.  Technically, the North Pole is in the middle of the ocean, and I don’t believe there are territorial claims though.  Of course, with his fearsome legendary powers of retaliation, no IRS agent wanting to be on the “nice” list would mess with him.

 

Share

Tax Roundup, 1/4/2013: How many seconds of federal spending do you cover? And more debris from the bottom of the Fiscal Cliff.

Friday, January 4th, 2013 by Joe Kristan

20130104-1Spending, by the numbers.  Local radio guy Brian Gongol asks, Why do we baffle ourselves with huge numbers instead of talking about budgets in per-person terms?  Why, indeed?  You could ask 100 people on the street how much money the government spends and how big the deficit is, and you would be lucky to get the size of the budget within a trillion dollars.  The numbers are hard to comprehend.

The ability of the politicians to get away with talk about “millionaires and billionaires” proves this — a billion is 1,000 million, and while there are likely people on your street with a net worth of $1 million, you probably haven’t met anybody worth $1 billion.  They aren’t remotely the same thing.

In doing year-end tax projections for a client with a once-in-a-lifetime gain from a business sale and a huge resulting tax liability, I wondered how long his enormous (to me) liability would keep the government running.  Dividing the 2012 fiscal year spending of $3.796 trillion by the 31,536,000 seconds in a 365-day year, I figure that the federal blob spends $120,370.37 per second.  The biggest tax liability I’ve ever seen comes well short of funding 2 minutes of government operations.  I probably will never cover a second.  Where do you fit?

 

Fiscal Cliff Webinar!   I will be appearing with Roger McEowen on the “Tax Notes From the Fiscal Cliff” webinar at Noon January 14.  We will be covering the new legislation and the proposed 3.8% “Net Investment Income Tax” regulations.  Register today!

 

The IRS has published new withholding tables for the Fiscal Cliff Legislation (Accounting today)

 

Fiscal Cliff Notes:

Wall Street Journal:  Cliff Fix Hits Small Business; Many Small Entities or Firms May Face Higher Taxes This Year After the Deal

David Henderson, Pssst:  Someone tell the Republicans they won:

So here’s the big news: the anti-tax side won.  Sure, Obama would love
to raise taxes even more, especially on people making between $200K and $450K.  But now he has almost zero leverage to do that. 

I think that’s about right.  And now the President has lost his ability to distract attention from the ongoing fiscal calamity with arm-waving about “millionaires and billionaires.”

Derek Thompson, Sorry, Middle Class: In a Few Years, Your Taxes Will Have to Go Up, Too (via Going Concern).  You know, we could try spending less.  In any case, the rich guy isn’t buying.

Tim Carney: How corporate tax credits got in the ‘cliff’ deal

Katrina Trinko, Hollywood, Electric Scooters Benefit From Tax Breaks in Fiscal Cliff Bill (The Corner)

Brad Plumer, From NASCAR to rum, the 10 weirdest parts of the ‘fiscal cliff’ bill (Wonkblog, via Tyler Cowen).

Chris James, Fiscal Cliff Deal Adjust Capital Gain Rates and Qualified Dividend Rates (Davis Brown Tax Law Blog)

Paul Neiffer, Some More Goodies Buried in the Fine Print

Kay Bell, Redefining ‘wealthy’ for tax purposes

Tax Trials, Fiscal Cliff Legislation – American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012

Patrick Temple-West, Cliff fix hits small business, and more

Nick Kasprak, 2013 Tax Brackets (Tax Policy Blog)

Roberton Williams, TPC Tax Calculator Shows What Avoiding Fiscal Cliff Means for Taxpayers (TaxV0x)

Howard Gleckman,  What the Fiscal Cliff Deal Really Means for Taxes and Spending

TaxProf,  More Fiscal Cliff Tax Commentary

 

In other news…

Jack Townsend, Wegelin & Co. Pleads Guity to Conspiracy

Lynnley Browning, Swiss bank Wegelin to close after guilty plea.  They opened in 1741.

Jason Dinesen, Tax Predictions for 2013

Trish McIntire, Disclosing Prisoner Returns

Taxdood, Intrastate iGaming: Federal Reporting and Withholding Tax Obligations

Robert D. Flach, WTF IS THIS AMT EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT?

News you can use: “Have Fun and Don’t Be Bored” (Brian Strahle)

Share

10,400 congresscritters?

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010 by Joe Kristan

Considering how much damage the existing 435 members of the House of Representatives cause, would we like there to be maybe 10,000 of them?
In his only speech to the Constitutional Convention, over which he presided, George Washington asked that the initial Congress add seats; he thought that 40,000-resident districts were too big, and he thought 30,000 residents per congresscritter was a better number.
The average congressional district after the new census will have about 710,000 residents. Under George’s rule, there would be around 10,400 representatives. Would we be better off with that?
Brian Gongol argues that we would. Arnold Kling argues that the failure to increase the size of the House since 1911 “is one of the factors that I argue has made the United States structurally less democratic in recent decades.”
Having fewer congresscritters means more power for those that remain. That power, and the large staffs and perks that flow from it, makes it very hard to dislodge them.

Share