Is Iowa really a red state? According to personal finance site WalletHub, Iowa is a red state. But didn’t Iowa vote for Obama the last two elections? Not that kind of red state. WalletHub’s map has states with the most burdensome taxes as red states, and those with less burdensome taxes as green:
WalletHub analyzed how state and local tax rates compare to the national median in the 50 states as well as the District of Columbia. We compared eight different types of taxation in order to determine: 1) Which states have the highest and lowest tax rates; 2) how those rates compare to the national median; 3) which states offer the most value in terms of low taxation and high cost-of-living adjusted income levels.
WalletHub says Iowans have a tax burden 26% above the national average. They note, though, that when the rank is adjusted based on our cost of living, Iowa improves 10 places on their rankings.
This is a different measurement than the Tax Foundations well-known Business Tax Climate Index, which places Iowa at 11th-worst. Either way, it’s not a healthy system. And nothing major is likely to happen to change it anytime soon. Still, the The Tax Update’s Quick and Dirty Iowa Tax Reform Plan shows the way!
Supplies sales tax exemption advances. The Iowa General Assembly isn’t entirely idle on the tax front. Sometimes that’s a good thing, as in the House passage yesterday of HF 2443, exempting supplies used in manufacturing from sales tax. Business inputs in general should not be subject to sales tax, as they are likely to be taxed again when the finished product is sold.
Other than that, there isn’t a lot else to report on the Iowa tax legislative scene. The speedway tax break remains alive. The bill to broaden the Iowa capital gain “ten and ten” exclusion hasn’t cleared the committee level. Silly legislation continues to be introduced, like a 50% state tax credit for payments of principal and interest on student loans (HSB 673). Let’s encourage crushing student debt burdens!
But sometimes its best when the legislature does nothing. It’s hard to complain that HF 2770, the bill to pay doctors at their average charge rates with tax credits for “volunteering,” has languished.
The TaxProf notes the Death of Former IRS Commissioner Randoph Thrower; Was Fired for Refusing President’s Request to Audit His Enemies, quoting a New York Times story:
The end came in January 1971, after Mr. Thrower requested a meeting with the president, hoping to warn him personally about the pressure White House staff members had been placing on the IRS to audit the tax returns of certain individuals. Beginning with antiwar leaders and civil rights figures, the list had grown to include journalists and members of Congress, among them every Democratic senator up for re-election in 1970, Mr. Thrower told investigators years later. He was certain the president was unaware of this and would agree that “any suggestion of the introduction of political influence into the IRS” could damage his presidency, he said.
Mr. Thrower received two responses. The first was a memo from the president’s appointments secretary saying a meeting would not be possible; the second was a phone call from John D. Ehrlichman, the president’s domestic affairs adviser, telling him he was fired.
I’ll just note here that Doug Shulman, worst commissioner ever, left on his own terms.
David Brunori, Hawaii Tax Credit Craziness (Tax Analysts Blog):
According to some excellent reporting in the Honolulu Civil Beat, the Legislature is considering a slew of tax incentives to promote manufacturing in the state. Yes, there are those (particularly established manufacturers) who would like to promote something other than tourism, hosting of naval bases, and pineapple production. The main proposal (SB 3082) would provide tax credits for employee training and some equipment purchases. The goal is to turn Hawaii into 1960s Pittsburgh or Flint Mich., in their heyday. I have my doubts.
I don’t think that really plays to Hawaii’s strengths.
Howard Gleckman, A Terrible Response to the Internet Tax Mess (TaxVox)
Under the plan, the federal government would let retailers collect tax based on the levy where the seller is located, no matter where the purchaser resides. This would apply to all retailers, as long as they had no physical presence in the consumer’s state.
A firm could base its “home jurisdiction” on the state where it has the most employees, the most physical assets, or the state it designates as its principal place of business for federal tax purposes.
Given the nature of online sellers, changing locations to a no-sales-tax state would be fairly easy.
Interesting. I wonder if a “universal mail order sales tax rate” might ultimately be the answer. You could set this universal rate at, say, the average national sales tax rate, collect it from all buyers, and remit it to the delivery state through a clearinghouse run by the state revenue agencies.
Paul Neiffer, Cash Rents Equals Extra 3.8% on Sale. “However, once you are done farming and are simply renting the ground to other farmers (including relatives), then the rental income will be subject to the tax and even worse, selling the farmland for a large gain will result in extra tax.”
Jana Luttenegger, Filing From Home, and Health Insurance Reporting on W-2s (Davis Brown Tax Law Blog)
Everything is spinning out of control! Suburban Cleveland Councilman Denies Getting in Brawl With Liberty Tax Sign Spinner (Going Concern)