Posts Tagged ‘FATCA’

Tax Roundup, 10/8/14: Koskinen warns of another hellish filing season. And: FATCA “tormenting” offshore taxpayers.

Wednesday, October 8th, 2014 by Joe Kristan
The Younkers Building ruins, morning, March 29, 2014.

The Younkers Building ruins, morning, March 29, 2014.

Here we go again. We know from bitter experience that Congress might cause tax season delays by passing an election-year “extenders” bill at the last minute. IRS Commissioner Koskinen gave official warning yesterday in a letter to the head of the Senate Finance Committee:

This uncertainty, if it persists into December or later, could force the IRS to postpone the opening of the 2015 filing season and delay the processing of tax refunds for millions of taxpayers. Moreover, if Congress enacts any policy changes to the existing extenders or adds new provisions, the IRS would have to reprogram systems and make processing changes, which would result in longer delays. If Congress waits until 2015 and then enacts retroactive tax law changes affecting 2014, the operational and compliance challenges would be even more severe — likely resulting in service disruptions, millions of taxpayers needing to file amended returns, and substantially delayed refunds.

It was just such retroactive changes that made the 2013 filing season so awful. Add the first go round for Obamacare penalty computations on tax returns, and we can look forward to an even more wonderful tax season in 2015.

I predict that we will get a last-minute passage of the Lazarus provisions that keep dying and being resurrected, sometime in December. Of course, it could drag into January again. I expect pretty much all of the expiring provisions, including bonus depreciation, to be included. But I never rule out Congress dropping the ball entirely.

Other coverage: Richard Rubin, IRS Warns of Tax-Filing Season Delays If Congress Stalls 

Joint Committee on Taxation, list of expiring provisions 2013-2024 (pdf).

 

20140815-2Taxpayer Advocate: FATCA “Tormenting” TaxpayersTaxpayer Advocate Nina Olson doesn’t seem to be a fan of FATCA. She spoke to the Financial Markets Association yesterday, and it sounds like she foresees bad things ($link, my emphasis.):

“This is a piece of legislation that is so big and so far-reaching, and [has] so many different moving pieces, and is rolling out in an incremental fashion . . . that you really won’t be able to know what its consequences are, intended or otherwise,” Olson said. “I don’t think we’ll know that for years. And by that point we’ll actually be a little too late to go, ‘Oops, my bad, we shouldn’t have done this,’ and then try to unwind it.”

Wait, this was passed by our duly elected representatives. What could possibly go wrong?

Olson also questioned the penalty regime underlying FATCA. The law provides for a $10,000 penalty for failing to disclose a foreign bank account, and up to $50,000 for failing to disclose after IRS notification, she said. For someone with a $51,000 unreported foreign bank account, that could be a $60,000 penalty.

IRS policy states that penalties should be objectively proportioned to the offense, Olson said. “Putting a $60,000 penalty on someone for failing to report a $51,000 account does not seem to me like a penalty that is proportioned objectively to the offense,” she said.

Olson observed that a similar disproportionality emerged in recent IRS offshore voluntary disclosure initiatives, when the highest proportionate fines fell on the smallest accounts. In 2009 the median unreported balance for the smallest accounts was $44,000, she said. The lowest-balance account holders paid an FBAR penalty almost six times the actual tax due, she said. Yet the top 10 percent, with a median unreported balance of $7 million, paid a penalty roughly half the amount of tax owed, she said.

This is actually in keeping with the longstanding IRS policy of shooting jaywalkers while slapping the real international tax evaders on the wrist.

How could our legislative supergeniuses have come up with such an insane and unfair system? Look at the name of the legislation — “FATCA.” For fat cats, get it? They passed it claiming to be going after fat cats, but drafted it in a way that beats up on everybody working or living abroad attempting to commit personal finance. But because they “intended” to go after fat cats, they absolve themselves of guilt for the collateral damage, the financial devastation of the innocent and unwary, the retirements ruined. And they smear the rare politician who points out the insanity of FATCA with accusations of being soft on tax evasion.

 

canada flagThere was some rare good news on the offshore tax compliance front yesterday when the IRS made it easier to get favored tax treatment on Canadian retirement accounts:  IRS Simplifies Procedures for Favorable Tax Treatment on Canadian Retirement Plans and Annual Reporting Requirements:

The change relates to a longstanding provision in the U.S.-Canada tax treaty that enables U.S. citizens and resident aliens to defer tax on income accruing in their RRSP or RRIF until it is distributed. Otherwise, U.S. tax is due each year on this income, even if it is not distributed.

In the past, however, taxpayers generally would get tax deferral by attaching Form 8891 to their return and choosing this tax treaty benefit, something many eligible taxpayers failed to do. Before today’s change, a primary way to correct this omission and retroactively obtain the treaty benefit was to request a private letter ruling from the IRS, a costly and often time-consuming process.

Many taxpayers also failed to comply with another requirement; namely that they file Form 8891 each year reporting details about each RRSP and RRIF, including contributions made, income earned and distributions made. This requirement applied regardless of whether they chose the special tax treatment. The IRS is eliminating Form 8891, and taxpayers are no longer required to file this form for any year, past or present.

But in case you think the risk of fiscal catastrophe related to Canadian accounts is past, the IRS warns:

The revenue procedure does not modify any other U.S. reporting requirements that may apply under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and section 6038D. See FinCEN Form 114 due by June 30 of each year, and Form 8938 attached to a U.S. income tax return for more information about the reporting requirements under the BSA and section 6038D.

In other words, you can still be assessed a penalty of 50% of the account balance for not filing an FBAR report on the accounts, or a $10,000 penalty for not disclosing a balance on Form 8938 foreign financial asset form. But if you get ruined by these penalties, consider it a sacrifice on the altar of “an improved set of global rules,” you fat cat.

Russ Fox has more: IRS Simplifies Reporting for RRSPs and RRIFs.

 

20141008-1William Perez, Missed the Tax Deadline? Here’s what penalties might apply

Donnie Johnson, Liz Malm, What Does Yesterday’s Supreme Court Same-Sex Marriage Appeal Denial Mean for Same-Sex Couple Tax Filers? (Tax Policy Blog). Maybe taxpayers in Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin could learn from Jason Dinesen’s work here in Iowa.

Kay Bell, Gambling pays out a $38 billion bonus to tax collectors.

Jason Dinesen, Glossary of Tax Terms: IRA

KCCI, Pharmacist’s trial has been moved to next year. The owner of Bauder’s Pharmacy, facing tax and other charges arising out of alleged illegal sales of painkillers, is now set to go on trial in February.

 

Howard Gleckman, How Asset Building Tax Subsidies Miss Their Targets (TaxVox):

Nearly one-third of all federal tax expenditures–$384 billion in 2013 alone– is aimed at various forms of asset building, such as retirement savings, higher education, and home ownership. Yet, according to research by several of my Tax Policy Center and Urban Institute colleagues, these tax breaks do little to help low-and middle-income households build wealth.

Gee, you might conclude that maybe not every problem is a tax problem.

 

Two more TaxGrrrl Guest Posts: The IRS’s Uncharitable Treatment Of Charitable Contributions (Andrew VanSingel) and Roadways And Taxes (Charles Horn III).

David Brunori, Last Stand for Soda Taxes — Hopefully (Tax Analysts Blog). “If they can’t get folks in uber-liberal San Francisco and Berkeley to vote for soda taxes, they should just hang up their hats.”

Sebastian Johnson rounds up some more Tax Proposals on the Ballot this Election Season at Tax Justice Blog.


TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 517

Jeremy Scott, Will the EU Commission Crack Down on Irish Tax Deals? (Tax Analysts Blog).

 

News from the Profession. Some Big 4 Alumni Just Can’t Quit Their Old Firms. (Caleb Newquist, Going Concern). No problem for me.

 

Share

Tax Roundup, 3/28/14: Trusts beat IRS. And: Seven-bedroom poverty!

Friday, March 28th, 2014 by Joe Kristan

Trusts won big over the IRS yesterday.  The Tax Court ruled that trusts can “materially participate” in business activities.  Taxpayers who materially participate in an activity don’t have to pay the Obamacare net investment income tax on income from the activity.  I have a full writeup, Tax Court decision cuts 3.8% Obamacare Net Investment Income Tax for many trusts.  

 

20120912-1FATCA: giving the government more ways to shoot jaywalkers.

 We submit these comments in the hope that they will help lawmakers and the public understand that FATCA, while intended to catch tax evaders, is poised instead to impose serious and unjustified harms on people who live around the world as non-resident U.S. citizens and green card holders, as well as their family members and business associates.

After all, you have to shoot the jaywalkers so you can slap the real international tax evaders on the wrist.

Quoted text from “Submission to Finance Department on Implementation of FATCA in Canada” by Allison Christians and Arthur Cockfield, via the TaxProf.

 

William Perez, Tips for Same Sex Married Couples Filing Their Tax Returns.

Kay Bell, Donating and deducting gifts to current, past disaster victims

TaxGrrrl, Taxes From A To Z (2014): N Is For Name Change and Taxes From A To Z (2014): O Is For Overpayment

Steven Rosenthal, You Could Owe Capital Gains Taxes When You Spend Bitcoin (TaxVox)

Tax Trials, IRS Releases Guidance on Convertible Virtual Currency: Bitcoin Treated As Property for Federal Tax Purposes

Scott Schumacher, Does Equity Have a Role in Offers in Compromise? (Procedurally Taxing)

20140328-1

William McBride,New Study Finds U.S. Multinationals Pay Extremely High Effective Tax Rate. (Tax Policy Blog). Since Iowa corporate rates are the highest in the U.S., that makes us number 1 in the world, baby!

TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 323

Tax Justice Blog, Tax Cuts Fall Flat in Idaho

False choice.  The Drive for Tax Reform: Hitting the Breaks or the Gas?  (Renu Zaretsky, TaxVox)

Career Corner.  The More Money Your Parents Made, the Less Likely You Are to Become an Accountant (Going Concern)

 

monk mountainIf all poverty were like this, monasteries would be more popular.  A Pennsylvania taxpayer is accused of trying the old “I’m a church” dodge.  From Lehighvalleylive.com:

Erik Von Kiel, formerly of Macungie, falsely told the federal government he was a minister with a Utah-based religious organization, and that he had renounced any interest in property or income, authorities said.

He did so while concealing his salary and assets, including a seven-bedroom Macungie home he bought with his wife in 2006 and later sold for $175,000, according to court documents.

Seven bedrooms?  Not bad for poverty.  Probably more accessible than many monastic residences, too.

 

Share

Tax Roundup, 8/16/2013: Red light cameras, fleeing the country, and suing the IRS.

Friday, August 16th, 2013 by Joe Kristan


gatso
Clive red-light cameras to go live again Monday (Des Moines Register):

The cameras will be turned back on Monday at 12:01 a.m.

In addition to approving the contract the council signed off on language that sets in motion a plan for the program to be dismantled at the end of the current fiscal year, which is June 30, 2014.

After turning them off because they are obnoxious, the Clive city fathers are restarting them with a frank admission that they need the money this year.  So of course it’s about the money, just like in Des Moines, except Clive admits it.

 

TaxProf, IRS Hits Estate of Former Detroit Pistons Owner With $2 Billion Tax Bill.  “The estate tax bill alone — $1.9 billion — would represent more than one-tenth of the $13 billion collected through that tax nationwide in 2010, when taxes on most estates of those who died in 2009, like Davidson, were paid.”

 

passportMatthew Feeney on Renouncing U.S. Citizenship to Escape the IRS (Reason.com):

It’s astonishing that the American government would punish some of the world’s most patriotic people by making them choose between their citizenship and the headache that comes with trying to be compliant with awful laws like FATCA. The requirements imposed by FATCA on foreign financial institutions and the punishments that come with non-compliance mean that sometimes foreign banks don’t let Americans open accounts at all.

It’s only astonishing anymore if you haven’t figured out just how awful our political leadership is.

 

Your web guide to despair.  The IRS has taken live a new web page for Affordable Care Act Tax Provisions for Individuals and Families

 

Peter Reilly,  Charity Begins At Home But Cannot End There.

You have to wonder why more families don’t start exempt organizations.  Well, it may be because, as the PLR explains it does not work – for at least four different reasons…

Peter then provides the reasons, one by one.

Trish McIntire,  Documenting Donations

 

Tony Nitti, IRS (Finally) Consolidates All Late S Election Relief Into One Handy Revenue Procedure 

Kay Bell,  Turning financial failures into tax-saving successes

TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 99

Robert D. Flach is ready with your Friday Buzz!

 

Phil Hodgen, I was in Philmont.  I plan to be there next year.

 

News you can use.   How to Blow a 1031 Exchange (Paul Neiffer):

The taxpayer indicated they had rolled the gain into other real estate costing about a $1 million and wondered how the rollover gain would affect the basis of their new real estate investment.  Many of you probably can guess what my next question was.  “Did you receive the cash and then buy the real estate?” To which, the taxpayer said “Yes, we received the cash, but we bought the real estate within 180 days of selling the land”.  

That doesn’t work, as Paul explains.

 

taxanalystslogoChristopher Bergin, Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue Service (Tax Analysts Blog):

Here’s the background: On May 21, Tax Analysts sent a FOIA request to the IRS seeking all materials used since 2009 to train IRS personnel in the IRS exempt organizations determinations office in Cincinnati. I’m guessing that there is probably no one who doesn’t know that the IRS is currently under huge scrutiny for how it handles – or mishandles – applications for tax exempt status. This is not just a big story for Tax Analysts but for a lot of news organizations as well. We asked the IRS to expedite the process and it agreed, telling us that our request had “priority” and that it would “make every effort to respond as quickly as possible.” But on June 25, the IRS invoked a 10-day extension period, which extended the deadline to July 10. But in the same letter, the IRS also told us it wouldn’t be meeting that deadline either, and unilaterally extended the response date to August 9.

If the IRS has nothing to hide, it sure has a funny way of showing it.

Going Concern has more:  The IRS Is Being Difficult.  Caleb really, really wants to believe that nobody cares about IRS harassment of the Tea Party.  Yet stories like this keep coming up. 

 

 

Share

Tax Roundup, 7/10/2012: A truly Rich expatriate; the tax effects of executive politics; just park it by the pole.

Tuesday, July 10th, 2012 by Joe Kristan

Lynnley Browning at Reuters reports that “Denise Rich Renounces U.S. Citizenship, Will Save Tens Of Millions In Tax Dollars,”  prompting millions to wonder, who is Denise Rich?  Celine Dion fans (I’ve never met one, but I know they are out there) will know her as the songwriter behind Celine’s “Love is On the Way,” but political junkies know her as the wife of Marc Rich, the former fugitive billionaire who stopped running when Denise pulled enough strings and spread enough cash around to get him a pardon at the end of the Clinton administration.

Her move prompted some folks to tell her not to let the door hit her on the way out, and perhaps anybody who enables Celine Dion deserves a little venom.  But we should ponder for a moment why money is fleeing the country like deposits fleeing a Greek bank.  Mark Steyn tells us why celebrating her departure is unseemly:

… all this “what sort of red-blooded American renounces her citizenship over tax?” stuff is a wee bit much. It is the Government of the United States, uniquely in the civilized world, that binds citizenship to tax. An American who falls in love with an Uzbek or takes a job helping starving Third World children in Southern Sudan remains liable for US taxation and has to file US paperwork that is, in fact, more onerous than that required of US residents, and is about to get more so…

Most countries tax you if you live within their borders, some tax you if you live elsewhere but earn money within their jurisdiction, but only America claims the right to tax you simply for being American – even if you, say, live in Belgium but drive over the border to work in Luxembourg every day. This is unique to the United States: Spain taxes you if you’re a resident of Spain, Slovenia taxes you if you’re a resident of Slovenia, but America taxes you if you’re an American who’s working as a teacher in Gabon. You’re at permanent risk of double-taxation, and the fines for minor and accidental infraction are arbitrary and confiscatory.

As I say, no other developed country does this – although Eritrea does.

On January 1st 2013, all this gets worse. The FATCAT act (technically, it’s FATCA, but we all get the acronymic message) makes it not worth a foreign bank’s while to do business with Americans. I don’t just mean Mitt Romney’s chums in the Cayman Islands, but an American of modest means on a two-year secondment to Hong Kong requiring a small checking account with which to pay local utility bills – or a small businessman attempting to expand his distribution in Canada.

IRS Commissioner Shulman’s shoot-the-jaywalkers approach to offshore tax compliance, combined with half-baked populist legislation against “the rich” that punishes Americans abroad and businesses for committing everyday finance, is quietly bleeding our economy with a thousand little cuts.  Fabulously-wealthy people like Denise Rich can take a hike, but most of us are stuck here.  We can berate her as “unpatriotic” for leaving, but when you get that $10,000 fine for being one-day late in reporting that bank account you inherited from Uncle Hans in the old country, she’ll have the last laugh.

The TaxProf has moreUpdate: Matt Welch on the Dark Side of Anti-”Swiss Bank Account” Politics”

But we can still move within the country:  Did a Maryland Tax Increase Cause Taxpayers to Flee the State?  (Russ Fox)

Nanette Byrnes: Study: Companies of Republican CEOs pay more tax than Democrats’ (Tax Break).  Why?  One theory is that Democratic CEOs would tend to be in industries that play the government for tax breaks, like low-income housing and renewable fuels, and that Democrats are more comfortable with politicians playing God with the economy.  Unfortunately, the desire  to meddle with the economy via tax breaks is one thing both parties can agree on.

But we knew that before it become official: It’s Official: Tax Gridlock Until After November Election (Janet Novack)

William Perez, Tax Reform Proposal from the Bipartisan Policy Center

Blaming the accountant: Rihanna Files Suit, Alleges Financial Mismanagement Resulted in Tax Audit (TaxGrrrl)

Anybody could lose track of $800,000 in singles.  Take this hard-working Ohio attorney described by Cincinnati.com:

Sparta attorney Meredith “Larry” Lawrence will be sentenced in October on federal tax evasion charges for failing to report income from various sources – including Racers Gentleman’s Club in Sparta.

A jury found him guilty Friday on three counts of filing a false tax return for three consecutive years, starting in 2005.

Attorney by day, strip club operator by night?  “Gentlemen’s clubs” tend to be open late.  Maybe he was just sleep deprived?

During the two week trial, Assistant U.S. Attorney Elaine Leonhard described how federal agents found $800,000 in Lawrence’s safety deposit boxes.

She described how fees collected from women who stripped at the club would be stuffed in a white envelope and delivered to Lawrence once a week. Strippers were independent contractors required to pay “house fees” to dance at the club. The strippers even had to pay a parking fee.

“Parking fee?” Yes, the glamor has truly gone out of show business.

Share

Another victory in Shulman’s war against international tax cheats!

Thursday, April 12th, 2012 by Joe Kristan

File:US Permanent Resident Card 2010-05-11.JPGThe IRS international tax compliance pogrom seems to work under the assumption that you need to terrorize the innocent to catch the guilty.  Phil Hodgen has an important story about how these efforts hound the innocent out of the country:

He has no U.S. tax exposure since he pays more in tax there than he would pay in the United States.  So he’s not doing this to save income tax.  This is the common assumption:  that people leave the USA to avoid paying tax.  My experience is quite the contrary.  This gent is typical.

His business takes him back and forth from Europe to the United States and it would be exceedingly valuable for him to remain a green card holder.  Yet today he sent in the forms to cancel it.

Wait.  If he’s not a tax cheat, what’s he afraid of?

The U.S. tax complexities would force him to lose an opportunity to participate in a startup business.  His tax situation is so anomalous compared to the other participants that he would either have to absorb enormous compliance costs himself, or be barred from participating in the business as too much trouble.

So there you have it.  A person who gets things done.  Who builds businesses.  He’s been pushed out of the USA because of U.S. tax compliance burdens.  Not U.S. tax.  U.S. paperwork.

Commissioner Shulman’s ham-handed enforcement of international tax rules, and the FATCA rules that only make it worse, will impose unintended, but easily foreseen, damage on the economy for years to come.

Share

Your tax preparer needs to know about that place in Mexico

Friday, March 23rd, 2012 by Joe Kristan

Do the new rules on reporting foreign financial assets require you to report foreign-owned real estate?  Strictly speaking, no, reports Jack Townsend, but practically it often does.  He quotes the IRS web site on the issue:

Foreign real estate is not a specified foreign financial asset required to be reported on Form 8938.  For example, a personal residence or a rental property does not have to be reported. 

If the real estate is held through a foreign entity, such as a corporation, partnership, trust or estate, then the interest in the entity is a specified foreign financial asset that is reported on Form 8938, if the total value of all your specified foreign financial assets is greater than the reporting threshold that applies to you.

It’s the “corporation, partnership, trust or estate” language that gets you.  Many countries don’t allow direct foreign ownership of their real estate, but they do allow it through various entities.  Mexico, for example, requires a sort of trust for ownership of real estate.  You also have to report loans you have made to foreign persons, including real estate loans.  As the penalties for failure to report foreign financial assets on Form 8938 start at $10,000, even for inadvertent violations, you don’t want to miss the filing.

 Related: IRS lowers foreign financial asset filing thresholds; sets up new jaywalker-hunting blinds

Share

Americans abroad become the lepers of international finance

Monday, March 12th, 2012 by Joe Kristan

The much-touted FATCA “crackdown” on offshore accounts has predictibly made life difficult for Americans working overseas. A testimony at Phillip Hodgen’s’ place:

I personally was denied banking services in the US soon after I established myself in Europe. I was unable to maintain a brokerage account and lost thousands in gains that I was not allowed to realize. The brokerage, Donaldson, Lufkin, Jeanrette closed my account without prior notice (the letter arrived weeks later). My banking relations for simple things like credit cards and checking account in the US (needed to pay student loans and other occasional purchases in the US) have been strained to say the least.
European banks told me to buzz off when I tried to open brokerage accounts… Now, despite my US nationality, the banks tell me to go to H every time I try to do anything.

Well done, Congress! Well done, Mr. President!
UPDATE: Robert W. Wood, Despite FATCA, FBAR Penalties Still Under Fire

Share

Wall Street Journal coverage of the great IRS jaywalker hunt

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012 by Joe Kristan

The unrelenting efforts of Congress and Commissioner Shulman to clobber Americans abroad for foot-fault violations of tax reporting requirements — to shoot the jaywalkers to encourage the others — has gotten the attention of the Wall Street Journal editorial page. From William McGurn:

At the end of the day, after all, the global economy is really about human beings interacting with one another, bettering themselves and enriching their societies as they do. From the Ohio contractor working in Baghdad to feed his family back home, to the American professor teaching in Hong Kong, to the Boston-bred banker working in London, these individuals are overwhelmingly productive and law-abiding. In an ever more competitive global marketplace, their presence provides a critical boost to American fortunes in key parts of the world.
So here’s a New Year’s resolution for the IRS and its allies inside the Beltway: Maybe it’s time we treated these Americans as economic assets instead of criminal liabilities.

Via the TaxProf
Related: IRS lowers foreign financial asset filing thresholds; sets up new jaywalker-hunting blinds

Share

IRS lowers foreign financial asset filing thresholds; sets up new jaywalker-hunting blinds

Friday, December 16th, 2011 by Joe Kristan

Congress last year passed yet another poorly-considered foreign financial asset reporting requirement, one which largely overlaps — but doesn’t replace — existing reporting requirements. Yesterday the IRS issued the rules for complying with the “FATCA” requirements; the rules require reporting at lower amounts than those on their draft forms issued earlier this year.
The new rules (TD 9567) require the filing of new Form 8938 (not yet released in final form) at these threshholds:
Unmarried taxpayers living in the US: The total value of your specified foreign financial assets is more than $50,000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $75,000 (was $100,000 on the draft Form 8938) at any time during the tax year.
Married taxpayers filing a joint income tax return and living in the US: The total value of your specified foreign financial assets is more than $100,000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $150,000 (was $200,000 on the draft 8938) at any time during the tax year.
Married taxpayers filing separate income tax returns and living in the US: The total value of your specified foreign financial assets is more than $50,000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $75,000 (was $100,000 on the draft Form 8938) at any time during the tax year.
The new form will apply to the the same foreign financial accounts covered by the old FBAR Form TD F 90-22.1 — which is still required — for account owners. It will also apply to a number of items that don’t have to be filed under the FBAR rules, including:
- Shares of a foreign company held directly and not through a broker. For example, many policyholders of Canadian insurer Sun Life received share certificates when the company demutualized. Unless the shares have been transferred to a broker, they are to be reported on Form 8938.
- Interests in foreign partnerships
- Loans to foreign persons.
So if you fronted some cash to Uncle Hans in the old country to help him finance his new strudel shop, you might have a reportable foreign financial asset.
The penalties for failure to file this form are stiff: $10,000 for filing the form even a single day late. If experience with other IRS foreign reporting rules is a guide, they will automatically assess this penalty if they think it applies, no questions asked.
The rules for reporting foreign accounts are a mish-mash of overlapping and confusing rules that do more to ensnare the unwary — to shoot the jaywalkers — than to catch international tax cheats. Many of the items reported on the 8938 are already on the FBAR form, or on Form 5471 or Form 8865 (though some information won’t have to be reported a second time). It’s too bad the IRS isn’t doing more to streamline the rules, eliminate duplication, and help people come into compliance. Instead, they are bent on hammering the inadvertent violators.
Additional information:
Press release, IRS Releases Guidance on Foreign Financial Asset Reporting
Do I need to file Form 8938, “Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets”?

Share

Making friends through intimidation

Wednesday, October 26th, 2011 by Joe Kristan

The IRS war on foreign bank accounts isn’t going over well in the Great White North, reports Robert W. Wood at Forbes.com. Between the intrusive “FATCA” legislation extending U.S. reporting requirements to foreign banks and the terrorizing of Canada residents with FBAR penalties, we aren’t making friends:

Canadian government ministers, banks, press and citizens have joined the chorus to drum FATCA out of town, doing their part to send it packing. Canadian Federal Minister of Finance Jim Flaherty wrote U.S. newspapers with Canada

Share

Canada: IRS, you aren’t the boss of me

Tuesday, September 20th, 2011 by Joe Kristan

Canada reminds Congress and the IRS that they actually don’t run other countries.

Share