David Brunori notes ($link) some odd behavior by Good Jobs First, a left-side outfit that has been on the side of the angels by highlighting the baneful effects of corporate welfare tax incentives. The American Legislative Exchange Council came out with a report blasting cronyist tax incentives, and rather than embracing the report, Good Jobs First ripped it — because the Koch Brothers are the Devil:
Yet, Good Jobs First slams ALEC because many recipients of tax incentives have close ties to ALEC. But so what? The fact that corporations, including those run by the Koch brothers, provide support to ALEC doesn’t diminish the argument that incentives are terrible.
Weirdly, Good Jobs First primarily blames the recipients of corporate welfare for taking the money, rather than the politicians who give it away:
Moreover, Good Jobs First inexplicably says that ALEC is wrong to blame policymakers rather than the companies that receive incentives. But the blame for those horrible policies rests squarely on the shoulders of lawmakers and governors who perpetuate them. In a world where the government is handing out benefits to anyone who asks, it’s hard to fault the people who line up for the handout. No one has been more critical of tax incentives than I, but I’ve never blamed the corporations. Nor do I blame the army of consultants and lawyers who grease the wheels to make incentives happen. There’s no blame for anyone other than the cowardly politicians from both parties who can’t seem to resist using those nefarious policies.
Precisely correct. When somebody is handing out free money, it’s hard to turn it down when your competitors are taking all they can.
I have seen smart people I respect do everything short of donning tin-foil hats when talking about the Koch Brothers and their dreadful agenda of influencing the government to leave you alone. Maybe everyone needs an Emmanuel Goldstein.
Adam Michel, Scott Drenkard, New Report Quantifies “Tax Cronyism” (Tax Policy Blog)
Annette Nellen, What about accountability? California solar energy property. Green corporate welfare is still corporate welfare.
Russ Fox, Where Karen Hawkins Disagrees With Me… The Director of the IRS Office of Preparer Responsibility commented on Russ’ post “The IRS Apparently Thinks They Won the Loving Case.” Russ replies to the comment:
Ms. Hawkins is technically correct that Judge Boasberg’s order says nothing about the use of an RTRP designation. However, the Order specifically states that the IRS has no authority to create such a regulatory scheme. If there isn’t such a regulation, what’s the use of the designation?
The courts closed the front door to preparer regulation, so the IRS is trying to find an unlocked window.
TaxGrrrl, IRS Imposes New Limits On Tax Refunds By Direct Deposit. “Effective for the 2015 tax season, the IRS will limit the number of refunds electronically deposited into a single financial account (such as a savings or checking account) or prepaid debit card to three.”
This seems like a measure that should have been put in place years ago. The Worst Commissioner Ever apparently had other priorities.
Kay Bell, Actor Robert Redford sues NY tax office over $1.6 million bill. The actor gets dragged into New York via a pass-through entity in which he had an interest — a topic we mentioned last week.
Renu Zaretsky, August Avoidance: Corporate Taxes and Budget Realities. The TaxVox headline roundup covers inversions, gridlock, and Kansas.
Ajay Gupta, The Libertarian Case for BEPS (Tax Analysts Blog) BEPS stands for “Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.”
Matt Gardiner, Inversions Aside, Don’t Lose Sight of Other Ways Corps. Are Dodging Taxes (Tax Justice Blog). Don’t worry, Matt. If I did, my clients would take their business elsewhere.
Robert D. Flach, HEY MR PRESIDENT – DON’T SHOOT THE MESSENGER! “If there is something wrong with the Tax Code do not blame the accountant or tax professional. We have a moral and ethical responsibility to bring to our clients’ attention all the legal deductions, credits, loopholes, techniques, and strategies that are available to reduce their federal and state tax liabilities to the least possible amounts.”
Jack Townsend, U.S. Forfeits Over $480 Million Stolen by Former Nigerian Dictator. The headline is misleading — the U.S. received the cash in a forfeiture — they seized it, rather than forfeiting it.
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 459
Instapundit, GANGSTER GOVERNMENT: Inspectors general say Obama aides obstruct investigations. The majority of the 78 federal inspectors general took the extraordinary step of writing an open letter saying the Administration is blocking their work as a matter of course. The IRS stonewalling on the Tea Party scandal is part of the pattern.
News from the Profession. It’s Completely Understandable Someone Might Sign Over 200 Audit Reports By Mistake (Adrienne Gonzalez, Going Concern)
You mean they didn’t shift to organic carrot juice? “From Coke to Coors: A Field Study of a Fat Tax and its Unintended Consequences” (Via Maria Koklanaris at Tax Analysts):
Could taxation of calorie-dense foods such as soft drinks be used to reduce obesity? To address this question, a six-month field experiment was conducted in an American city of 62,000 where half of the 113 households recruited into the study faced a 10% tax on calorie-dense foods and beverages and half did not. The tax resulted in a short-term (1-month) decrease in soft drink purchases, but no decrease over a 3-month or 6-month period. Moreover, in beer-purchasing households, this tax led to increased purchases of beer.
I’m sure the politicians who want to run everyone’s diet will angrily demand higher beer taxes in response.