There’s a new deadline this year for Iowa business owners with real property. Iowa business owners have a January 15, 2014 deadline to apply for the business property tax credit enacted in this year’s legislative session. Many have yet to apply, reports gazette.com:
Commercial property owners have been slow to apply for a new property tax credit designed to give a little boost to small businesses.
Most business owners who own the property in which the business operates are eligible for the Iowa Business Property Tax Credit.
A $50 million pool of money is available for the first year of the new tax credit. The state legislature included the credit in an historic property tax relief bill signed into law on June 12.
“It is important they get them in now so we can process them,” said Cedar Rapids City Assessor Scott Labus.
Paul Neiffer, Final Net Investment Income Regs Have Good News For Farmers:
In Final Regulations issued earlier this week, the IRS changed their interpretation of this rule and have now indicated that any self-rented real estate or rental real estate that has been properly grouped with a material participation entity will not be subject to the tax. In even better news, any gain from selling this type of property will also be exempt from the tax.
Good news not just for farmers, but for any business where the owners rent property to a corporation they control.
Tony Nitti, IRS Issues Final Net Investment Income Tax Regulations: A First Look And More It was a dirty trick to issue them over Thanksgiving, when I wasn’t watching. I will be posting on some key issues.
Illinois storm victims get filing relief (IRS news release):
The President has declared the counties of Champaign, Douglas, Fayette, Grundy, Jasper, La Salle, Massac, Pope, Tazewell, Vermilion, Wabash, Washington, Wayne, Will and Woodford a federal disaster area. Individuals who reside or have a business in these counties may qualify for tax relief.
The declaration permits the IRS to postpone certain deadlines for taxpayers who reside or have a business in the disaster area. For instance, certain deadlines falling on or after Nov. 17, and on or before Feb. 28, 2014, have been postponed to Feb. 28, 2014.
The IRS is also waiving the failure-to-deposit penalties for employment and excise tax deposits due on or after Nov. 17, and on or before Dec. 2, as long as the deposits are made by Dec. 2, 2013.
You don’t have to be damaged to qualify, you just have to be located in the affected area.
No, that’s not the real threat. The Muscatine Journal mistakes the painkiller for the ailment:
Tax breaks for wind-power producers are set to expire in a little more than a month, threatening hundreds of manufacturing and energy jobs in the state if nothing is done.
In Iowa, much of the attention has focused on the federal Renewable Fuel Standard in which the federal government guarantees a market for biofuels. But for Iowa’s turbine manufacturers and power companies, it’s the federal production tax credit that takes precedence.
It’s not the loss of the tax credits that threatens these industries. It’s their inability to survive without subsidies or, in the case of ethanol makers, their inability to sell their product unless people are forced by law to buy it. The subsidies only dull the recipients awareness of their real ailment.
David Brunori, Confusing Tax Cuts with Tax Reform (Tax Analysts Blog):
But increasing or decreasing tax burdens should not be confused with tax reform. Tax reform should mean something. I define tax reform as meaningful changes to the tax system that comport with the general notions of sound tax policy. The goal should be to make the system fairer, neutral, more efficient, and more stable. The changes should also increase economic development and job growth. And they should ensure that the government raises enough revenue to meet the public service demands of the citizenry. Changing the rates or tinkering at the margins is not reform.
Nor is giving tax spiffs to influential or sympathetic constituencies, but that’s been the Iowa way for some time now.
Lyman Stone, Missouri Considering “Massive” Incentives for Boeing (Tax Policy Blog):
This is bad tax policy in spades. Governor Nixon rejected a flawed, but still broad, tax cut on the grounds that taxes don’t matter much for businesses, but government services do. Now Missouri policymakers may try to attract one specific company with a “massive” and narrowly-targeted tax break, despite lack of evidence that incentives lead to economic growth, and ample evidence that they create problems.
It’s all about directing funds to insiders with good lobbyists.
Cara Griffith, A Change of Culture (Tax Analysts Blog). She talks about the natural tendency of tax authorities to conceal information and make tax practice an insiders’ game. She notes that North Carolina doesn’t release private rulings and hasn’t updated public corporate directives since April 2012. Iowa is better, but they haven’t updated their “What’s new” website since August.
William Perez, Updated Form W-9. With the additional rules of FATCA piled on top of existing foreign withholding rules, you should make sure to get a W-9 from your vendors, depositors and ownership groups.
Jason Dinesen reminds us of the Iowa Insurance Premium Deduction
Trish McIntire reminds us that Refund Advances are really expensive loans.
Robert D. Flach, TO PER DIEM OR NOT TO PER DIEM – THAT IS THE QUESTION.
Kay Bell offers some Tax-saving moves to make by Dec. 31, 2013
Howard Gleckman, Obama Will Try to Clarify the Role of Tax-Exempt Groups in Politics. Your new role in furthering public debate? Shut up!
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 207
Tax Justice Blog: This Holiday, The Tax Justice Team Is Thankful For… In other words, watch your wallets, folks.
The Critical Question: Do We Need A Clergy Tax Simplification Act Of 2014? (Peter Reilly)
TaxGrrrl, This Man’s Nuts: Plan To Sell Testicle For New Car Is Taxable As if there weren’t enough non-tax arguments against this plan.