Just the man to build bridges to Republicans who fund the IRS. From Bryan Preston, IRS Chief Koskinen Has Donated Big to Democrats Over the Years:
According to the Washington Free Beacon, Koskinen has donated about $100,000 to Democrat candidates and committees since his first donation in 1979. His donor recipients include Gary Hart, the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic nominee in each presidential campaign since 1980 (which would even include Walter Mondale, who stood no chance of beating President Ronald Reagan in 1984), the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Hillary Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s campaigns. He most recently donated $2,500 to Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) in 2013.
He has given no money to Republicans.
It’s hard to believe how tone-deaf he is to the Tea Party scandal, but this helps explain it. (Via Instapundit)
Jeremy Scott, Lost Lerner E-mails Latest Example of IRS Death Wish (Tax Analysts Blog), my emphasis:
In contrast to their GOP colleagues, Democrats rushed to Koskinen’s defense. That is, perhaps, understandable, even though much of what the IRS has done during this scandal is indefensible. Democrats probably want to defend their president’s pick to head the IRS, and maybe they want to try to change the narrative heading into a potentially disastrous midterm election. But the reality is that the IRS isn’t doing them any favors. There’s only so much incompetence and disingenuous behavior that can be run through a political spin machine. The Democrats’ reflexive defense of Lerner (whose conduct can’t be excused) and their apparent willingness to accept any explanation from Koskinen (who didn’t even try to adequately explain why he hid information on the lost e-mails from February until late June) is baffling. Democrats weakly attempted to paint the GOP as on a witch hunt for a conspiracy, as though the IRS’s mismanagement and appearance of bias weren’t enough to justify congressional inquiry.
The IRS isn’t doing Democratic congresscritters any favors, nor are they doing any for the IRS. They are just making the IRS look more like a partisan agency, which could cripple tax administration for years.
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 411
Kay Bell, Save space and trees: Digitize your tax records. That way if you lose them, the IRS will surely understand.
Russ Fox has some valuable information for online gamblers trying to stay FBAR compliant: Online Gambling Addresses (Updated for 2014)
Robert D. Flach has a Tuesday Buzz for you!
Tony Nitti, How State Taxes Could Play A Role In Carmelo Anthony’s Landing Spot. Nah, state taxes don’t matter…
Peter Reilly, Step Kids Remain Step Kids After Divorce. So you may still have a dependent, if not a spouse.
Jack Townsend, Comments by IRS Personnel on New Streamlined and OVDP Procedures. “The new procedures were designed to ‘encourage folks who are considering quiet disclosures to come in with their hands up’ and avoid taxpayers coming into OVDP with the intention to opt out.”
Annette Nellen, Bitcoin Taxation – Clarity and Mystery, “If you are a tax practitioner and don’t think you need to deal with it, I’d be surprised if none of your clients uses bitcoin.”
William Perez, Backup Withholding.
Tyler Dennis, The Clinton’s Estate Tax Planning Demonstrates the Arcane Nature of the Estate Tax (Tax Policy Blog):
When the Clintons created the trust in 2011, their property’s assessed value was $1.8 million. Without a residential trust, the future appreciation between 2011 and 2021 would count against the gift tax. If the property appreciated at a 4% annual rate and reached $2.6 million by 2021, that’s the amount that would count. With the residential trust, though, the Clintons were able to “lock in” the value of the home at its 2011 value of $1.8 million without actually relinquishing the property to the beneficiary of the trust.
Most supporters of higher taxes assume that they won’t have to pay them.
Renu Zaretsky, Disbelief, Devolution, and Death Benefits. The TaxVox headline roundup talks about the Koskinen appearance before the Issa committee, and about how a surprising proportion of new life insurance is taken out on employees.
Andrew Lundeen, The Average U.S. Worker Pays over $16,000 in Income and Payroll Taxes (Tax Policy Blog):
The tax burden is a combination of income taxes at the federal, state, and local levels as well as the employee and the employer payroll taxes. Of the 31.3 percent tax burden, 15.4 percent is due to income taxes and 15.9 percent is due to payroll taxes, over half of which is paid by the employer on the employee’s behalf. (Workers pay the cost of the employer-side payroll taxes through lower wages.)
Heck of a deal.
Stephanie Hoffer, Kuretski, the Tax Court, and the Administrative Procedure Act (Procedurally Taxing).
Another great tax planning idea down the tubes. Kidnapping Prostitutes Is Not a Good Way to Claim Dependents for Tax Purposes (Greg Kyte, Going Concern)
If you didn’t think he was a bad guy already… Adolf Hitler: Billionaire tax-dodger?