Since then, of course, the new “weaponized IRS” has, in fact, come to be seen as illegitimate by many more Americans. I suspect that, over time, this loss of moral legitimacy will cause many to base their tax strategies on what they think they can get away with, not on what they’re entitled to. And when they hear of someone being audited, many Americans will ask not “what did he do wrong?” but “who in government did he offend?”
This is particularly true since the Obama administration is currently changing IRS rules to muzzle Tea Partiers.
While I don’t think it’s that bad yet, it’s headed that way if things don’t change. And, as Glenn points out, it’s not changing:
Meanwhile, the person chosen to “investigate” the IRS’s targeting of Tea Party groups in 2010-2012 is Barbara Bosserman, a “long-time Obama campaign donor.” So the IRS’s credibility is in no danger of being rebuilt any time soon.
I think this is a terrible and shortsighted mistake by the Administration. So much of its agenda, especially Obamacare, depends on effective IRS administration, but as the recent budget agreement proved, the GOP isn’t going to fund the IRS when it thinks that’s the same as funding the opposition.
The USA Today piece makes broader points about the effect of the loss of faith in civil servants as apolitical technocrats; read the whole thing.
Via the TaxProf.
Andrew Lundeen at Tax Policy Blog has two new posts on tax reform. In Tax Reform Should Simplify the Code and Grow the Economy, he says:
We need to eliminate the biases in the code against savings and investment, so individuals have the incentive to add back to the economy, and businesses have the capital to buy new machines, structures, and equipment – all the things that give workers the ability to be more productive and earn higher wages. And we need a tax code that is simple and understandable, so taxpayers know exactly what they pay and why.
We’ve been going the wrong way now for 27 years. In Responses to Senator Baucus’s Staff Discussion Drafts, he curbs his enthusiasm for the tax reform options offered by outgoing Senate Finance Committee Chairman Baucus:
Generally speaking, we found that the tax reform proposals in these drafts go in the wrong direction. Our modeling shows that they damage economic growth, hurt investment, and, in many instances, violate the principles of sound tax policy: simplicity, transparency, neutrality, and stability.
The post links to a point-by-point examination of the Baucus proposals.
TaxProf, Martin Luther King, Jr. and the IRS:
This past year, much ado was made about the so-called “IRS-Gate” and concerns that the Obama administration may have used the agency to target Tea Party and other right wing groups. … [W]hat often is not stated during the Martin Luther King Holiday weekend is that King, early in his leadership of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), was routinely subjected to IRS audits of his individual accounts, SCLC accounts as well as accounts of his lawyers, first starting during the administration of President Dwight Eisenhower and continuing through the Kennedy administration.
If you audit me, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine…
Kay Bell, IRS abuse of power, now and in MLK’s day. “Overall, the IRS is paying for its operational indiscretions by receiving less money and more restrictions on how it does spend what funds it has.”
Paul Neiffer, Section 179 Update (or Not):
Here are my official updated odds on when we might know what the actual 2014 Section 179 amounts will be:
By Memorial Day 10 Billion to 1
By Labor Day 10 Million to 1
By the November Mid-Term elections 500 to 1
Between the November Mid-Term Elections and December 15, 2014 25 to 1
After December 15, 2014 and before January 1, 2015 1 to 1
After December 31, 2014 5 to 1
I give about 5 to 1 odds in favor of the current Sec. 179 deduction being extended to $500,000 for 2014, and I think that Paul is right that it is most likely to occur during the lame-duck session. I think odds are about 50-50 on an extension of 50% bonus depreciation. It’s too bad the Feds have closed Intrade, as this would be a betting market I would like to follow.
TaxTrials, Leona Helmsley, Angry Employees Strike Back:
Their mistreatment of employees and squabbles over bills are the stuff of legend and left prosecutors rife with eager witnesses when it came time for trial.
Helmsley was just as arrogant about her taxes, famously telling her housekeeper: “We don’t pay taxes, only the little people pay taxes.” Helmsley participated in several schemes to avoid paying millions of dollar in income and sales taxes.
Sometimes that sort of thing comes back and bites you; read the post to see how it bit Helmsley.
William Perez on an important topic: Tips for Securely Sending Tax Documents To Your Accountant. First, don’t send anything with your Social Security Number in an unencrypted email. Like many firms, Roth & Company offers a secure upload platform to send sensitive information. If your tax firm has one, use it. They are the safest way to transmit confidential information and files.
Phil Hodgen wonders whether there is a Delay in approving renunciations at State Department? It’s harder to shoot jaywalkers when they are running away.
Missouri Tax Guy goes back to basics with An Introduction to the Double-Entry Bookkeeping System. Just remember, Debits are on the door side.
Andrew Mitchel has posted a New Resource Page: 2013 Developments in U.S. International Tax
Kay Bell, $4 billion more tax breaks for Boeing from Washington State. Taxing you to give money to folks with good lobbyists.
Jim Maule is appropriately annoyed by the use of the term “IRS Code.” It’s the Internal Revenue Code, and it’s written by Congress, not the IRS. Remember that when you vote.
Keith Fogg, Qualified Offers – Is it meaningless to offer what you think a case is worth? (Procedurally Taxing)
Jack Townsend, The New Provision for Tax Restitution and Ex Post Facto
The Critical Question: Is Kent Hovind A Tax Protester? It doesn’t seem like a more promising career path for him than his forays into evolutionary biology.