Steven Miller, acting head of the IRS since Doug Shulman left office, apparently hasn’t been any more honest than The Worst Commissioner Ever about IRS harassment of right-side political groups. AP reports:
Miller was first informed on May, 3, 2012, that applications for tax-exempt status by tea party groups were inappropriately singled out for extra scrutiny, the IRS said Monday.
At least twice after the briefing, Miller wrote letters to members of Congress to explain the process of reviewing applications for tax-exempt status without disclosing that tea party groups had been targeted.
We’re supposed to tell the truth when we file our returns. It’s not asking too much for them to return the favor.
The incompetence boggles the mind. It’s also bewildering how the Service could sit in front of GOP lawmakers and chastise them for underfunding tax enforcement when employees were using some of those supposedly precious funds to conduct a politically charged vendetta against conservative exempt organizations.
I think the perpetrators were quite competent in doing what they set out to do. The only incompetence was in getting caught. But he’s absolutely right that the agency’s poor-mouthing, including next week’s furloughs, will no longer convince anybody.
But it still disturbs me that no one in Washington really seemed to care until the behavior went public.
Many of us didn’t believe the IRS would really do something so outrageous. I had seen some of the questions that IRS was asking Tea Party outfits, and they seemed out of line, but I figured the IRS was being an equal-opportunity annoyance. That they did it politically is what is triggering the outrage.
Tax.com has moved. For reasons that elude me, Tax Analysts has apparently given up the handy Tax.com domain and moved their excellent group blog to a tab on their home page, Tax.org. I think that’s a mistake, but it’s worth going out of your way to find it.
It’s Tuesday, so it’s Buzz Day at Robert D. Flach’s place.
Career Advice. Protip: Threatening to Kill Your Colleagues, Even in the Midst of a Brutal Busy Season, Is Never Cool(Going Concern). OK, I take it back. Mistakes were made. There was no threat intended in my overzealous pursuit of tax return excellence. It was just an administrative shortcut. OK, incompetent, but not evil. I vow to find out exactly what happened. If I threatened anyone, it was outrageous.
If the IRS hoped Friday’s “apology” for giving extra special attention to tax-exemption applications of right-side groups would settle things, they’re very disappointed this weekend. The Washington Post reports that the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration will soon issue a report saying Friday’s apologizer, IRS Director, Exempt Organizations, knew this was going on in 2011. Meanwhile, in 2012 IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman was still testifying that IRS was not picking on the Tea Party.
So not only was the Shulman era at IRS grasping, incompetent and casually cruel, it was dishonest.
The documents, obtained by The Washington Post from a congressional aide with knowledge of the findings, show that the IRS field office in charge of evaluating applications for tax-exempt status decided to focus on groups making statements that “criticize how the country is being run” and those that were involved in educating Americans “on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.”
Yes, we sure need to keep an eye on those wingnuts who want to educate people on the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Dangerous lunatics, they are!
There is so much blog coverage of this that I won’t even try to round it all up. A few links from our blogroll:
The report doesn’t shay whether or not Shulman was informed about the Tea Party questioning, but it does show the IRS’s chief counsel was. It’s standard procedure for the counsel and commissioner to discuss this sort of thing before a Congressional hearing.
If so, The Worst Commissioner Ever can only plead incompetence instead of lying to Congress.
Nina Olson, IRS Taxpayer Advocate, has an article in Tax Analysts (via the TaxProf) affirming her support for taxpayer regulation. Ms. Olson has done much good work as Taxpayer Advocate, but her support for increased preparer regulation is economically uninformed and hopelessly wrongheaded.
I’d like to report a hijacking. It looks like somebody at Tax Analysts forgot to renew their ownership of the tax.com domain name. Going there this morning gets this:
Tax.com is (has been?) home to the great group blog featuring, among others, David Brunori, Christopher Bergin, David Cay Johnston, Martin Sullivan, Cara Griffith and Clint Stretch. I hope this is only a temporary hijacking.
Politicians advance plan to allow politicians to give more tax money to private businesses. From TheGazette.com:
Iowa communities would be able to designate special 25-acre development zones and use a share of sales tax and hotel-motel tax revenues to assist private projects of at least $10 million under legislation that’s getting bipartisan support.
House File 641 would establish reinvestment districts designed to spur development of “big ideas,” said Sen. Matt McCoy, D-Des Moines, who led a Senate Ways and Means subcommittee that revamped the bill representatives approved 87-9 last month.
This is, of course, an awful idea. Politicians are notoriously bad at allocating investment capital, and they tend to make sure it goes to their cronies and contributors. But when the state’s Governor, a member of the purported small government party, does an end-zone dance over a giant federal subsidy to a private utility controlled by a billionaire, the battlefield is left to the crony capitalists. The House version of HF 641 passed 87-9.
New York State’s comptroller says giving $2.8 billion in tax breaks over five years added more than a million jobs, which would be great news except that the state lost jobs.
I’m confident Iowa’s job-creating tax breaks work just as well.
For capital gains, the current law is already out-of-step with international standards. After the fiscal cliff, combined state and federal capital gains rates increased from 19.1 percent to 28 percent. This is more than 10 percentage points higher than the international average. One suggestion, of course, is to tax capital gains at the rate at the 1986 rate of 28 percent. This would push America’s average combined federal and state capital gains rate to more than 35 percent, more than double the international average.
A chance traffic stop on I-75 in Lee County uncovers a massive tax fraud scheme. Deputies say the woman accused used her job to steal personal information – even stealing from people who were dead.
Thursday, 23-year-old Tequila Gordon was sitting in the Lee County Jail. Her bond was set at $72,000.
Prosecutors say she worked at liberty tax services in 2009 and stole personal information from dozens of people.
I would think having a first name of “Tequila” would make getting a good job challenging. It won’t be any easier now.
Search for the Tax Fairy leads to federal prison. The Tax Fairy, in the imagination of believers, appears in the form of magical legal maneuvers that make your taxes all go away. Your drinking buddies may even claim to have seen it, or that their tax guy knows her.
It can hurt when you find that there is no Tax Fairy. It must hurt for one South Dakota surgeon. From RapidCityJournal.com:
Friends and family described Dr. Edward Picardi as a compassionate, highly skilled surgeon, but the accolades failed to spare the doctor a five-year prison sentence for income tax evasion on Tuesday.
Despite the good the Sturgis man was proclaimed to have done in his life, Picardi, 56, is the same man a federal jury convicted of 13 felonies last October, U.S. Chief District Judge Jeffrey Viken said when he sentenced the doctor.
Picardi was charged with income tax evasion after an exhaustive federal investigation of his financial practices spanning 10 years from 1999 through 2009. He used an elaborate network of dummy corporations and several foreign banks to divert thousands of dollars in income.
The indictment says the scheme was hatched with the aid of a Maryland attorney who set up a phony employee leasing scheme to suck taxable income to shell companies, which the surgeon tapped for cash as needed. This worked fine, until one day it didn’t, and now it’s a five-year unpaid vacation, plus tax, interest and penalties.
There is no Tax Fairy.
Jana Luttenegger, Disclaiming an Inheritance (Davis Brown Tax Law Blog). Sometimes it’s better estate planning to turn down an inheritance and let it go to your kids or some other beneficiary. But you have to do it right:
Most importantly, the disclaimer must be made before you accept any benefit in the gift, and it must be an unqualified disclaimer. (No, you can’t have a party at the house and then decide you don’t want it.) Once the disclaimer is made, it is irrevocable — you can’t change your mind. If you properly disclaim, the property will pass as if you predeceased (you do not get to direct where the property goes).
The looming debate over the federal debt limit is a depressing reminder that we’re living in the Age of the Manufactured Crisis. And it encourages a sort of political nostalgia – a yearning for that bygone era when tough lawmakers made the tough decisions that kept federal debt at manageable levels. Well, sorry to tell you, but there were never any fiscal heroes.
Just politicians who show by their actions that they are happy to spend us to Greece.
Jason Dinesen, Same-Sex Marriage, Community Property, And Multi-State Income — Part 1. ”Indeed, some of the most complicated tax returns I’ve ever prepared have been for same-sex couples that moved from California (a community property state) to Iowa (not a community property state) during the middle of the year.”
Think of it as the ballpark program you pick up before a baseball game. You can watch the game without it, but it is much more fun if you can keep score and know a little something about who plays for the visiting team.
Except much less interesting than baseball, and the players are uglier and less skilled.
Lauryn Hill’s parents are 150 years old! The singer received a three-month prison sentence yesterday for failing to file tax returns, but the New Jersey native still may struggle with math, according to the reliable source of tax news, TMZ.com:
“I was put into a system I didn’t know the nature of. … I’m a child of former slaves. I got into an economic paradigm and had that imposed on me,” Hill said.
She continued, “I sold 50 million units … now I’m up here paying a tax debt. If that’s not likened to slavery, I don’t know what is.”
As slavery was eliminated nearly 150 years ago with the passage of the 13th Amendment, Ms. Hill either has difficulty with arithmetic or remarkable parents. The slavery analogy is interesting. So if tax is slavery, is President Obama the chief slave driver? The IRS Commissioner? Can we be sold down the river? To who?
Ideas that would work perfectly well in song lyrics can sound so wrong in court. The artist describes feelings, impressionistically. It’s in no way an excuse or justification. But sometimes artists/politicos use court as a forum for expression without any expectation that it will advance their legal cause. One can intelligently and consciously eschew persuasion and victory.
Perhaps. Still, sometimes celebrities just say strange things.
David Brunori doesn’t think much of the tax wisdom of the Iowa House of Representatives ($link):
The Iowa House of Representatives recently passed the Iowa Reinvestment Act, which would allow companies to keep sales tax revenue they collect rather than turning it over to the general fund as the citizens think will happen. Basically, the act is designed to allow businesses to recoup the cost of development. The state has done that before to allow the public to help finance a speedway and other projects that apparently can’t be justified in the free market. The vote for that abomination of tax policy was 87 to 9. That’s what we call bipartisan bad tax policy.
Just more of using your money to subsidize the well-lobbied and well-connected.
The idea of the IRS preparing individuals’ returns is a classic example of a theory that cannot survive in a practical world. Like most theories, it deserved an experiment. It had that chance, in California, and it failed, with only a tiny portion of the eligible population deciding to participate.
Making taxpayers’ lives easier is a matter of simplifying the tax law, not enabling the complexities by turning tax preparation over to the IRS.
This strikes me as wise. I just can’t imagine IRS data processing ever making this possible, considering the complexity of the income tax and the way Congress changes it all the time.
On one hand, $3.4 million is a lot of money — nobody should doubt that. But we’re also nearly completely blind in America to how much is “enough” for retirement. Many people would say the word “millionaire” and imagine Uncle Pennybags or Uncle Scrooge. But consider this: If you wanted to get $40,000 a year in retirement income and do it just on interest payments alone (in other words, if you were trying to avoid taking anything out of your nest egg and just live on the interest), then if you had your money in “safe” 10-year Treasuries earning 1.78%, then you’d have to have more than $2.2 million in the bank. Under those conditions, “rich” doesn’t really look so rich anymore.
I don’t think the nation’s biggest problem is people saving too much.
Holding your breath for tax reform? Exhale. Martin Sullivan says tax reform is on the Fast Track to Nowhere. (Tax.com)
We have written several times about the dangers of nontraded or thinly traded REITs. They are a popular way of investing in real estate but they can be difficult to sell or liquidate if an investor suddenly needs cash.
I saw an elderly, ill client with severe cash problems while holding a private REIT investment that he couldn’t cash out. This really does happen. This is not a problem with widely-traded REITs, which are as liquid as any stock.
Jim Maule, Why the “Toss Tax Records After Three (or Seven) Years” Advice is Bad. I never throw away tax returns, and you need to keep records to support the cost of shares and big assets. If you have loss carryforwards, you need to keep the records that support the losses as long as you are using the carryforwards.
Potassium forever? An accused embezzler apparently was in no hurry to stand trial. From StarTribune.com:
A Texas man faces more than 16 years in federal prison for his role in a scheme to bilk nearly $400,000 from his former Eagan employer, Advantage Transportation.
Clayton “Craig” Hogeland, 43, also obstructed justice by faking a life-threatening medical condition, U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz found. That caused delays for both his trial and sentencing hearing.
How did he delay his trial?
Further health-related delays stretched out the trial before his conviction on Dec. 6, 2011. He was placed in custody Jan. 8, 2013, and the erratic blood potassium readings stopped. Six days later, his wife reported to federal authorities that she found in his belongings four zip-top bags of what turned out to be potassium chloride.
Despite his continuing complaints about symptoms after being jailed, tests revealed no abnormal blood potassium levels, the prosecution said.
I’m not sure this was well thought-out. What’s the next move? More potassium? Maybe when you are looking at 16 years in federal prison, delay is its own reward.
A reporter for a nationally prominent publication has contacted me to help him get in touch with people who have gone through one of the OVDI/P programs to discuss their experiences and thoughts about the programs. If you are interested and/or willing to do that, please contact me at jack@tjtaxlaw.com and I will put you in touch with the reporter.
So maybe it’s a chance for those of you who’ve been put through the ringer for a foot-fault violation to get a little justice.
The opposite of a sales tax holiday: Retailer Target Jumps The Gun On Sales Tax (TaxGrrrl). A South Carolina Target store probably made few friends when it started charging a higher sales tax rate a month early.
Are you irritable? Sleeping less? Impatient with your friends? Putting on weight? Thinking about divorce? Yes? Sorry to hear, you must be going through a stressful time.
Oh, wait, are you an American? Yes?! Whew, you’re behaving normally then. If you were to read this AICPA press release, you might be inclined to believe that your take home pay being 2% lower than last year would have been the cause of all those things…
Cage Match: Iowan Peter Fisher takes on the Tax Foundation. Mr. Fisher has written a study for Good Jobs First, a left side advocacy group. Mr. Fisher who shows up in The Tax Update occasionally, doesn’t care for the Tax Foundation’s Business Tax Climate Index:
The TF, on the other hand, despite claims to the contrary, ignores the consensus approach to assessing business taxes in the economic literature and attempts to portray the effect of state and local tax law on business profits in an entirely different fashion: by stirring together no less than 118 features of the tax law and producing out of that stew a single, arbitrary index number. That number turns out to bear very little relationship to what businesses actually pay.
A good business tax climate, to the Tax Foundation, doesn’t take money from some businesses and give most of it to other businesses; good policy is based on “simplicity, neutrality, transparency, and stability.” I agree.
The problem here is that we do not claim to measure business tax burdens. We measure and rank tax structures, and this because the size of a tax is less important than the economic distortions it creates. This is a fundamental error in Fisher’s understanding of tax policy.
Mr. Fisher seems more focused on “equity,” whatever that means. But even if you think the tax law should be used to punish the rich and reward low incomes, cross-border mobility makes state tax systems an awful place to to that.
Trish McIntire, First Time Penalty Abatement. The IRS will usually abate minor penalties for first-time infractions, but they don’t like to talk about it.
Jen Carrigan, Should You Expect an Audit? A guest poster at Missouri Tax Guy’s place explains the IRS exam process.
Video! The Iowa Bar Association now is selling DVDs of “Notes from the Fiscal Cliff,” a January webcast I did with Roger McEowen of the ISU Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation. The outline is here. Supply your own popcorn.
New U.K. film tax credit indictments. It appears that the Brits are slowly moving towards the Iowa approach of jailing filmmakers instead of subsidizing them. Ic.Scotland.co.uk reports:
Five people are to be charged in connection with a film industry tax relief fraud which cost the public purse around £125 million, the Crown Prosecution Service said.
The group allegedly abused a tax relief that allows investors in the British film industry to offset losses against other tax liabilities in order to cheat the public revenue.
“Around £125 million” translates to around $194 million. And in Iowa film producers are serving time for stealing merely single digits of millions. It just goes to show what you can accomplish with a national effort.
Boo. House bill would give IRS authority to regulate tax pros(Kay Bell) The power grabbers at IRS and their buddies at the national franchise tax prep firms have been thwarted by the courts. Now they are using their congresscritter friends to put in the fix.
Kay sadly falls for it:
The quality independent tax professionals are following tax law changes, staying up to date and providing their clients with reliable tax services. Down the street, however, an inept preparer is undercutting their prices and mucking up the system for all of us — the IRS, tax pros and taxpayers alike.
The IRS can’t regulate anybody into competency. They can make people pass a “competency” test that really is a literacy test. They can make people pay for CPE. But they can’t make anybody competent who wouldn’t be otherwise. What they can do is drive little preparers out of the business with nagging paperwork, red tape and hassles that the big boys can just assign to their compliance departments, and, when necessary, to their lobbyists. This reduces the supply of preparers, increasing the cost of preparation for taxpayers.
The real problem with tax errors isn’t preparers; it’s the horrendous tax law and the inept legislators who make it happen.
In a 2011 paper published by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Veronique de Rugy and Adam Thierer recommended “an ‘origin-based’ sourcing rule for any states seeking to impose sales tax collection obligations on interstate vendors.” Under that rule, which mirrors what happens when you buy something while visiting another state, each business collects sales tax on behalf of the state where it is based, no matter where the customer happens to be.
The beauty of this approach is that it treats all retailers equally, eliminates the daunting challenge of dealing with many different taxing authorities, and respects state policy choices while encouraging tax competition between jurisdictions. Evidently the idea makes too much sense for Congress to consider.
That would motivate online sellers to locate in low tax jurisdictions, which is why congresscritters from high-tax places will never allow it to happen.
Legislator insists that thieves get $11 million as price of property tax deal. As Iowans pay their 2012 balances due on today’s state income tax deadline, they may want to take a moment to ponder how careful the legislature is about spending the money they are sending in.
The Des Moines Register reports that Senator Joe Bolkcom demands an increase in the Iowa earned income credit as the price of a property tax bill:
Sen. Joe Bolkcom, D-Iowa City, chairman of the tax-writing Senate Ways and Means Committee, spoke at a Statehouse news conference sponsored by The Coalition for a Better Iowa, which released a booklet with the stories of Iowans who have been helped by the earned income tax credit. About 200,000 Iowa working families receive the tax credit, which assists households with incomes under $45,000.
Senate Democrats want to raise the earned income tax credit from 7 percent now to 20 percent at a cost of about $55 million annually.
Both Sen. Bolkcom and the Register fail to mention the massive fraud rate of the earned income tax credit. The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration this month reported:
The IRS estimates that 21 to 25 percent of EITC payments were issued improperly in Fiscal Year 2012. The dollar value of these improper payments was estimated to be between $11.6 billion and $13.6 billion.
Applying that fraud percentage to Sen. Bolkcom’s proposal will result in $11.5 million to $13.75 million in “improper” — mostly fraudulent — Iowa EITC payments. Remember that the EITC is a “refundable” credit, which means that if it exceeds your tax, the state writes you a check. It’s a spending program, a welfare program.
I would say it takes a special kind of legislator to demand $55 million in spending knowing that it’s an appropriation of at least $11 million to thieves, but really it just takes a run-of-the-mill legislator spending your money instead of his own.
The EITC as a poverty trap: phaseouts of the benefit impose stiff marginal tax rates on the working poor.
Only somebody who doesn’t prepare tax returns would say something this stupid. The TaxProf links to this from a University of Wisconsin academic:
This Article analyzes the ongoing structural transformation by observing and explaining the advantages that accrue from pursuing social and regulatory objectives through the tax code. In particular, this Article identifies a number of legislative and normative advantages that tax-embedded policies offer.
The tax law has one important job: to raise revenue. If this author had ever done business tax returns for a living, she would know what a challenge it is to simply determine taxable income. If she had ever helped a client through an IRS audit, she would know how difficult it is for the agents to simply work through the accounting, let alone run a bunch of social programs on the side. The author should be made to spend three years working at a storefront tax prep business to learn the chaos her views cause outside the faculty lounge.
Baucus’s shift to the right in the last few months (which people had assumed was positioning for the election next year) has antagonized more than just progressives. It seems his Senate colleagues are growing frustrated as well.
And that will severely hamper the chances that a major tax reform bill will make it to the Senate floor.
The tax, which took effect Jan. 1, applies to the “net investment income” of married joint filers who have more than $250,000 of income (or $200,000 for singles). Only investment income—such as dividends, interest and capital gains—above the thresholds is taxed. The rate is a flat 3.8% in addition to other taxes owed.
“Affluent investors who ignore this tax will be in for a total shock next April 15,” says David Lifson, a certified public accountant specializing in tax at Crowe Horwath in New York. Such income is typically not subject to withholding, and people won’t be factoring it into their estimated taxes. Lower-bracket taxpayers who receive a windfall large enough to owe the tax will also be in for a surprise.
This tax is shockingly complex, and it will surprise a lot of taxpayers next April.
Feds sue over Des Moines utility tax (Des Moines Register). Des Moines lost a long legal battle over its “utility tax” on electric bills. Now the federal government is after the city:
Federal prosecutors acting on behalf of the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs sued the city of Des Moines and MidAmerican Energy Co. on Friday, alleging that the city’s longstanding surcharge on gas and electric customers in Des Moines constitutes an illegal tax when levied against Uncle Sam.
When a taxpayer wins a jackpot, the casino gives them the W-2G for the win at that time. It’s up to the taxpayer to keep the W-2G safe and bring it into me, or their preparer, when their taxes are done. What happens to the W-2G? It gets shoved into a purse or pocket, thrown in the glove compartment or on the desk at home or thrown in the trash by accident.
I support keeping the deduction for acquisition debt mortgage interest on one’s primary personal residence, and the deduction for real estate taxes on the same primary personal residence, not to encourage home ownership, but as a form of “geographical equalization”.
In other words, he wants to help out people who live in places where houses cost more. I think that’s misguided, as it also encourages people who live in low-cost locales like Des Moines to build palaces with help from the taxman.
Russ Fox, 1700 Miles and a 7% Difference. Joe Mauer of the Minnesota Twins tries to avoid Minnesota residency for low-tax Florida. It went about as well as this season will for the Florida Marlins (or the Twins, for that matter).
Paul Neiffer, Don’t Forget Your Retirement Plan. “I was talking with a new farm client the other day about his estate plan and what struck me the most was not how much farm land value he had accumulated but rather the amount he had tucked away into his retirement plans.”
Get some competent advice about how to handle the past years. If the advice is OVDI, then stand up and walk away, swearing the mightiest oaths that a drunken sailor could swear.
Perhaps the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative has somehow failed to gain the confidence of the tax bar?
Our politicians have tried to do too much through the tax law. And that has created a complicated mess of winners and losers that makes the task of trying to reform it, even to some level of sensible, a daunting one.The poster child for this mess is the Earned Income Tax Credit. Like it or not, the EITC is welfare administered through the tax system. Do we really want our tax system to do that?
The tax law works best if it is seen solely as a tool to finance the government. Much of its hideous complexity comes from using it is the Swiss Army Knife of public policy. As you add more gadgets it becomes less useful at being a knife.
Mr. Bergin isn’t afraid to mention the elephant in the room:
And there is another huge problem. The EITC program leaks like a sieve. More bluntly and honestly stated, well-intentioned as it may be, the EITC has been corrupted. Don’t take my word for it. Recently, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration released a report stating that up to one-quarter of EITC payments made in fiscal 2012 were improper. How much does that represent? Try $13.6 billion. In one year. Using a ten-year budget window, that’s $136 billion, and that’s just thetainted stuff.
Supporters say the EITC is a program that “works.” Can you say that something “works” when it sprays billions to thieves every year?
Read the whole thing.
Fairness:
But the compliance costs imposed by the Marketplace Fairness Act would place smaller upstarts at a distinct disadvantage, which is, I suspect, one reason that market incumbents such as Amazon support the tax. The real cost of taxes is not the revenue out the door to the taxman; it’s the revenue out to the door to the taxman plus all of the costs involved in complying with the tax code.
Winston Churchill said that Americans can be counted on to do the right thing, after we have exhausted all other possibilities. He might have added that we usually start with the least direct and most complex approach. So it is with the energy tax policy expressed in President Obama’s FY 2014 budget.
I like this sentence: “By their nature, tax credits add complexity to the law and often reward behavior that would occur even without the credits.”
So far two clients have contacted me to report an issue – one with a 2011 refund andone with a 2012 refund. In both cases the refund was not directly deposited to the requested account. Instead it was applied to the subsequent year’s estimated tax. It was as if the taxpayer, or I, had entered the full amount of the refund on Line 75, although we clearly did not.
This isn’t a problem I have seen. Robert famously doesn’t e-file his returns. I wonder if it’s a simple keypunch error at the service center.
The legal business must really be getting tough, if lawyers have to resort to the lamest lame tax fraud scheme out there. A Monroe, Louisiana attorney named Francis Broussard has pleaded guilty to attempting to claim over $9 million through the “1099-OID” fraud. From thenewsstar.com:
According to the Stipulated Factual Basis in the plea agreement, Broussard, who has been licensed to practice law in Louisiana since 1986, had his accountant prepare his 2005 through 2007 tax returns, but the defendant never filed them. Broussard did present the documents to various financial institutions in efforts to obtain personal loans and other types of financing. In 2009, the defendant went to a different tax preparer to have his personal tax returns prepared for 2005 through 2008. The defendant brought already prepared federal tax returns along with a separate piece of paper with a set of numbers on it. The defendant instructed the preparer to use the set of numbers on Forms 1099-Original Issue Discount (OID) and on the Schedule B, Interest Income section of the form. The defendant’s fraudulent claim is based on the OID interest income.
The 1099-OID scheme is, to the extent it is coherent at all, based on the idea that government has a big cash stash for each of us. They don’t want us to know about it, goes the theory, but we can tap into it if we just fill out the right tax forms. It’s not surprising that people fall for it — heck, we fall for big delusions every time we vote — but it is surprising that a lawyer would give such a preposterous scheme a try.
TaxProf, TIGTA: IRS Fails to Comply With Mandated Reduction in Improper Payments — 25% EITC Fraud Costs $14 Billion/Year. The earned income tax credit is a fraud magnet because it is “refundable” — if it exceeds your tax for the year, the IRS writes you a check. That makes it a welfare program run through the tax system. EIC advocates say it is a critical help for struggling families, but when that much is stolen from the program in a year, you have to think there is a better way.
Just because an LLC is taxed like a partnership doesn’t mean that every LLC owner can act like a general partner, as Colleen MacRaeexplains:
Last week the Iowa Court of Appeals in Three Minnows, LLC v. Cream LLC, held that a non-managing member did not have the authority to bind an LLC to a contract the member signed on behalf of the limited liability company.
24 current and former employees of the Internal Revenue Service have been charged for crimes relating to fraudulently obtaining more than $250,000 in government benefits. Thirteen of the current and former IRS employees have been charged federally with making false statements to obtain unemployment insurance payments, food stamps, welfare, and housing vouchers. All thirteen, individually charged in separate indictments, are alleged to have falsely stated that they were unemployed while applying for or recertifying those government benefits.
They may have been right about being unemployed, just wrong about the timing.
The headline producing data in the report was that revenue loss – about $181 billion – from corporate tax expenditures in 2011 was “approximately the same size as the amount of corporate income tax revenue the federal government collected that year.” That makes a headline grabber; here would be my version: “Corporations Got More in Tax Breaks Than They Paid in Taxes, Government Says.”
It’s almost like the tax exists only so the politicians can carve loopholes for their friends.
Kyle Pomerleau, TPC, What About the “Pass-Throughs?”. (Tax Policy Blog). Measuring business taxes needs to look beyond corporation taxes when most businesses are taxed on 1040s.
David Cay Johnston, Promises, Promises(Tax.com). “Candidate Obama promised in 2008 to reform the Alternative Minimum Tax, and President Obama promised at least an honest accounting in his first budget, but his proposed budget for Fiscal 2014 is silent on the issue.”
Iowa Senate Republicans advance income tax plan. TheGazette.com reports:
Sen. Randy Feenstra, R-Hull, said all 24 minority Senate Republicans have signed onto a proposal to significantly lower state personal income tax rates and simplify the Iowa tax code by offering a two-pronged approach that would eliminate federal deductibility and benefit most Iowans.
…
The Hull Republican said the proposed new tax structure would flatten the current nine income tax brackets into three, elimination of federal deductibility as a competitive impediment, enhance the current standard deduction for all taxpayers and provide an extra boost for blind, elderly and dependent Iowans, eliminate itemized deduction, increase personal exemption credits, and raise filing thresholds.
So far I have been unable to find the bill (though it being April 11, I’m not going to spend a lot of time looking for it today). As Senate Republicans have no chance of advancing a bill in the face of majority Democratic opposition, it’s really a gesture. Still, it’s nice to see that income tax reform remains alive, in spite of the Governor’s indifference this year. It’s also nice to see that the insistence on keeping the deduction for federal taxes is eroding. Much better to build it into a lower rate.
This is a bit weird given that President Obama rides on what is essentially the nicest corporate jet in the world. To be fair, the President is quite right that companies do not need a tax break to buy corporate jets. But since they don’t really get a tax break for buying corporate jets, we probably don’t need to spend this much valuable presidential time worrying about this non-problem.
Anything to make life difficult for a high-tech U.S. manufacturer. As long as the President continues to beat dead horses like this and the “Buffett Rule,” we know he is not at all serious.
Sure, Democrats pay lip-service to infrastructure, education, and the like. But for the most part, they are profoundly unwilling to make a wholistic case for activist, progressive government.
Actually, they probably wouldn’t get very far making the case honestly.
Flickr image by Samat Jain under Creative Commons license
Should we just get a bill from the IRS, instead of filing returns? That’s something Janet Novack seems to be thinking about. She has two guest posts on the issue:
Some people fear return-free filing will separate citizens further from the costs of government. I think that is caused by an income tax that now is effectively only on high-income earners. When 51% can send the bill to the other 49%, bad policy seems inevitable.
It makes me wonder: if there are “Errors to avoid,” are there errors we should seek out, or at least not sweat? I can’t think of errors I’d want to make on a tax return, but I can think of some that I wouldn’t lose sleep over:
1. Forgetting to check the “presidential election campaign fund” box. After all, your entire tax bill is basically the federal election campaign fund.
2. Misspelling the name of a stock on Schedule D.
3. Writing a “smiley face” next to the tax refund line.
4. Forgetting to update your “occupation” on the signature line when you change jobs.
The core problem is that the IRS cannot look into the hearts of companies and see which of them really needs to provide free lunch to their employees in order to have a healthy, vibrant company, and which of them is doing this in order to provide a tax-free boon to their workers.
In case anyone asks, donuts are critical to a healthy, vibrant tax practice.
Radio Iowa runs with this headline ”$8.7 million from “Development Fund” creates 600+ jobs.” This headline arises out a “study” paid for by the economic development bureaucracy (meaning: taxpayers) to demonstrate the tremendous job-creating skills of people who give your money to other people. How did this study demonstrate this job creation?
By assuming it.
From the “study”:
A survey of past recipients of Demonstration Fund investments was conducted by the Iowa Innovation Corporation to determine, among other things, how large these companies are now as compared to their pre-investment levels. This growth in size – in annual revenues and in head count – can be attributed in part to the involvement of and investment by the Demonstration Fund.
Furthermore, the resulting economic impact is greater than the direct increase in expenditures and head count, since those increases lead to a series of spillover effects, whereby the impact of new company spending and employee earnings ripples through local economies and supports additional economic activity and job creation. Job impact estimates are determined by using standard input-output methodologies and multipliers, as provided by the US Department of Commerce.
- that the businesses and jobs wouldn’t happen without the wonderful effects of your money being directed by politicians to those businesses.
- that the money wouldn’t have also generated jobs if it had been spent elsewhere.
That’s the same kind of thinking behind the 2009 stimulus spending spree. The results were less than assumed. The dark line is what government projected that spending would do to unemployment, using “standard multipliers.” The lighter blue line was the grim fate awaiting us absent a government binge. The red dots are the actual post-binge unemployment rates.
The study does not have the two words that could have given it credibility: “opportunity cost.” They assume that the money left in the hands of taxpayers would have done nothing. But it would have been spent elsewhere, undirected by politicians; it would have bought things, creating profits and jobs. But as they would have gone unclaimed by economic development officials, no press conference could have been called, so they don’t count.
Obama consistently ignores the statutory timeline for releasing his budget, and this year is the latest he has ever put forward a fiscal proposal. On all things administrative, the president is frequently dilatory. But those waiting with bated breath for Obama’s proposals will be disappointed — the budget will be more of the same and has little chance of actually being passed or even taken up by Congress.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Disclaimer
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
New U.K. film tax credit indictments. It appears that the Brits are slowly moving towards the Iowa approach of jailing filmmakers instead of subsidizing them. 
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
