Reciprocity = no state wage withholding. A newly-released policy letter from the Iowa Department of Revenue explains how the Iowa-Illinois tax reciprocity agreement works for an Iowan working in Illinois for a non-Iowa company. The letter is addressed to the employer:
Your employee is an Iowa resident, earning income in Illinois, and therefore is exempt from paying Illinois income tax on income earned from salaries, wages, and other compensation. For your employee to pay Iowa income taxes, the employee should make estimated payments by completing Form 1040ES – Estimated Income Tax for Individuals. The employee may also need to file an Illinois form showing that they are an Iowa resident not subject to Illinois withholding under the agreement.
While in theory it should make no economic difference whether you pay taxes through quarterly estimates or withholding, many taxpayers prefer withholding. It just seems less painful to have the money taken out before you see it, and you don’t have to remember to write those estimates. I wonder if the employee really feels better off.
The letter adds:
It is also possible for your business to register for an Iowa Withholding Tax Permit on the Department’s website (https://www.idr.iowa.gov/CBA/start.asp). In that case your Iowa resident employees could have those employees fill out an IA W-4 (available at https://tax.iowa.gov/form-types/withholding-tax) and you as the employer could withhold Iowa tax from their paychecks.
Illinois is the only state with which Iowa has a reciprocity agreement. Other states withhold (if they have an income tax) on Iowa employees, and the Iowans claim a credit for taxes paid in other states on their Iowa 1040s. That sort of works out like Iowa wage withholding in a way for Iowans working in Wisconsin, Missouri, Nebraska and Minnesota — except with the hassle of completing two full state tax returns. For those crossing the border to South Dakota, which has no income tax, the compliance problem is the same as for the Illinois taxpayer in this policy letter.
Wall Street Journal, American Tax Refugees: Why So Many Yanks Are Renouncing Their U.S. Citizenship (may be subscriber only link):
Fatca requires that foreign banks, brokers, insurers and other financial institutions give the U.S. Internal Revenue Service detailed asset and transaction records for any accounts held by Americans, including corporate accounts controlled by American employees. If a firm fails to comply, the IRS can slap it with a 30% withholding tax on transactions originating in the U.S. Facing such risks and compliance costs, many foreign firms have decided it’s easier to dump their American clients.
So Americans overseas are becoming increasingly unbankable. Not the wealthiest ones, of course, those “fat cat” potential tax evaders whom Democrats rail against. Much more vulnerable are sales reps, English teachers, lawyers, retirees—the overwhelming majority of American expatriates—whose modest finances make them unappealing clients amid Fatca’s compliance costs.
To get a few press releases, politicians have to break a few
Robert Wood, U.S. Ranks As Top Tax Haven, Refusing To Share Tax Data Despite FATCA. As long as the U.S. intrudes on other countries’ banks, the other countries will want to reciprocate.
Jack Townsend, National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olsen Comments on FATCA and OVDP. Quoting the Taxpayer Advocate: “The problem with FATCA is that it imposes burdens on taxpayers at all sorts of levels, and it’s not clear what benefits we’re really going to get from it or what we’ll be able to do.” It’s not about “we,” unless we are a politician looking for a cheap headline.
Robert D. Flach comes through with more Tuesday Buzz, with links to posts on minimum IRA distributions and small business money mistakes, among other things.
Kristine Tidgren, Tax Court Says 1972 Settlement Transfer Was Not a Gift (The Ag Docket). “One takeaway of this case for those outside of the Redstone family is recognition of the cold, hard fact that no statute of limitations applied to prevent the IRS from collecting taxes on this alleged 1972 gift.”
TaxGrrrl, Court Switches Gears, Says AICPA Can Sue IRS Over Tax Preparer Credentials. The IRS “voluntary” preparer regulation scheme hits a bump.
Russ Fox, I’m Sure Their Vacation in Arizona Will Impress the Sentencing Judge. “Mr. Joling wanted to be on “biblical safe ground” (he was a pastor) so he didn’t pay taxes.” Biblically safe, perhaps, but not legally, for sure.
Peter Reilly, Democratic Presidential Candidate Drops Out Without Releasing Tax Plan. And almost without anyone noticing.
Leslie Book, Halloween Special: Third Circuit Case Affirms Preparer’s Conviction For Aiding in Preparing False Tax Returns (Procedurally Taxing). “Despite the promise of oversight and its enhancing greater visibility, prosecuting bad apple preparers is an important after the fact way of ensuring that those who abuse the system know that their actions have consequences beyond bringing in fees for raiding the fisc.”
Jason Dinesen, Glossary: Gross Income/Gross Profit
William Perez discusses the new 401(k) Contribution Limits.
Joseph Henchman, Voters in Five States Consider Tax-Related Initiatives (Tax Policy Blog). Colorado ponders its marijuana tax windfall, Ohio considers approving one for itself.
Matt Gardner, Apple Shifts a Record $50 Billion Overseas, Admits It Has Paid Miniscule to No Tax on Offshore Cash (Tax Justice Blog). Showing once again that Apple management isn’t stupid.
Career Corner. Accounting Firms Need To Have More Transparent Conversations With Employees About Compensation (Caleb Newquist, Going Concern)