The Wall Street Journal covers identity theft today: “Identity Theft Triggers a Surge in Tax Fraud” It seems to be designed to tell what a great job the authorities are doing to fight the problem. It’s nice that they’re stepping up the efforts, but the time to do that was four years ago, when the problem started exploding. But the IRS was too busy with its attempt to regulate practitioners to be bothered with keeping billions from going out the door to two-bit grifters. The article refers delicately to the grifters:
The scam, which involves repeatedly filing fake tax returns electronically and receiving refunds within days, is so enticing it is attracting suspects not typically associated with white-collar crime. On Friday, two members of an alleged crack-dealing gang in Miami were indicted on charges they also ran a tax-refund scam on the side. Suspects typically steal lists of names and Social Security numbers. Then they file large numbers of electronic returns claiming refunds, and can start getting money before investigators spot the fraud.
The story notes that stealing from the taxpayers is only part of the damage caused:
The crime creates two victims—the U.S. Treasury and individual taxpayers, who only learn of the fraud when they try to file their legitimate returns. Those taxpayers are stuck with the hassle of proving to the IRS that the previous document was a phony claim.
And the process can drag over years, as an ID-theft victim who works with Jason Dinesen would attest. It’s a disgrace that the IRS has done so poorly at preventing ID theft, and it is doubly disgraceful that they don’t do a better job helping the victims of IRS negligence.
For your part, don’t help the ID thieves. Never disclose your social security number. Keep your tax information secure. Don’t transmit your social security number in an unencrypted email. If you want to transmit tax documents electronically, don’t send them as an email attachment. Use a secure file transfer site, like our FileDrop site.
Don’t let the door hit you. ‘House of Cards’ threatens to leave if Maryland comes up short on tax credits (Washington Post, via Politico):
A few weeks before Season 2 of “House of Cards” debuted online, the show’s production company sent Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley a letter with this warning: Give us millions more dollars in tax credits, or we will “break down our stage, sets and offices and set up in another state.”
That’s the problem with paying people to be your friend. The price only goes up. In California, the film credit scam industry may be losing a friend, according to Capital Public Radio: Calderon Indicted On Fraud, Bribery Charges:
The Department of Justice announced Friday that State Sen. Ron Calderon (D-Montebello) is facing 24 federal charges including bribery, wire fraud and money laundering. U.S. Attorney Andre Birotte said Calderon solicited and accepted $100,000.
“Ron Calderon, we allege, took the bribes in return for official acts. Such as, supporting legislation to those that would be favorable to those that paid him bribes and opposing legislation that would harmful to them. The indictment further alleges that Calderon attempted to convince other public officials to do the same.”
~Andre Birotte, U.S. Attorney
The legislation centered on a potential film tax credit and regulation of medical billing. Calderon is accused of accepting cash, trips, dinners and jobs for his children.
I think film tax credits, and all incentive tax credits, are fundamentally corrupt, as they provide better treatment for the well-connected at the expense of everyone else. In Iowa, though, they were able to rely on credulous legislators, without resorting to bribes.
Russ Fox, California State Senator Ron Calderon Indicted on Bribery & Tax Charges. “Mr. Calderon is facing a maximum of 396 years at ClubFed if found guilty on all charges.”
A victim of politically motivated tax prosecution goes free in Ukraine: Freed Ukrainian ex-PM Tymoshenko rallies protesters (CBC). She had been imprisoned on politically-convenient tax charges by the toppled would-be dictators there. With the complexity of the tax law, it is way too easy to indict somebody. That’s why IRS partisanship is so dangerous.
And yes, it can (and has) happened here.
William Perez has the scoop on Reporting Investment Income and Expenses
Jana Luttenegger, Taxing Olympic Winnings. (Davis Brown Tax Law Blog) Not a problem for the hockey team.
Kay Bell is right when she says Report all your income even if you don’t get a 1099. The 1099 is a useful reminder, but income doesn’t become tax free if you don’t get one.
Roberton Williams notes An Updated Marriage Bonus and Penalty Calculator at TaxVox.
William McBride, Empirical Evidence on Taxes and Growth: A Response to CBPP (Tax Policy Blog). The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities has never met a tax increase it doesn’t like, as if there never is a point that giving the mule more to carry slows it down. The McBride post mentions an often-overlooked aspect of our government spending:
The thing is in reality the federal government spends only a small fraction of its budget on public investments, such as roads and airports, and instead spends most of the budget on transfer payments, such as social security and healthcare. Transfer payments are unproductive and even harmful to economic growth, according to most studies. So in practice, income taxes mainly go to transfer payments, and this deal is a clear economic loser, according to the IMF and most academic economists.
Some folks, like Jim Maule, act like any complaint about the level of government spending and taxes means you are against roads, courts and public order — when most of what the government does is takes money from some people and gives it to other people.
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 291
The Critical Question. Sylvia Dion CPA Asks – Where Are The Women? (Peter Reilly)
Going Concern, The Ten Stages of Busy Season. “You begin to hate every single human being in your office”