Flickr image by Christian under Creative Commons license.
The IRS had good news for many Americans owning property in Mexico. In Rev. Rul. 2013-14, the IRS ruled that a “fideicomiso” land trust enabling Americans to hold residential property in parts of Mexico is not a trust for U.S. tax purposes. This means taxpayers who haven’t been reporting these as trusts on Form 3520 aren’t exposed to the $10,000 annual penalty that applies to taxpayers who fail to report their foreign trusts.
Don’t settle for just bad enough. The IRS: It’s Bad Enough (Christopher Bergin, Tax Analysts Blog).
The IRS is seriously and dangerously broken. This is not only unfair to the many dedicated public servants at the IRS; it’s unfair to all of us. Get to the truth. Arbitrarily punishing the IRS isn’t going to help any more than blindly defending the agency. The IRS needs fixing and it needs it now, and that starts with new and strong leadership inside the agency, and a President who is willing to spend the political capital on IRS reform. We don’t have that President. As for the Republicans, they’d rather turn the IRS into Monica Lewinsky.
Somehow I don’t think the IRS will ever be that cooperative.
We were happy to pay him, it was some of his best work. Another British filmmaker faces jail time for scamming the U.K. film tax credit system in making a film that never made it to the screen, reports the Express:
The scam included a bogus invoice suggesting Kill Bill star Carradine was paid more than £400,000 for 13 days worth of work, even though he had died two weeks prior to the date stamped on the notice.
This is the second criminal film project to hit the news in the U.K.; another one hilariously involved a film thrown together when the operators sensed the authorities were catching on to their scam. Meanwhile twofilmmakers are serving out their 10-year sentences for scamming the Iowa film credit program. You’d almost think maybe these film credits are just a scam entirely.
An ideal tax system is based on a broad base and low rates. At least that is what the thinking folks believe. An ideal tax system also treats similarly situated people and organizations the same. People concerned about fairness have always thought that. And an ideal tax system minimizes economic distortions. Now politicians of every stripe violate that ideal every day. Personally, I think politicians violate this idea because 1) they arrogantly want to dictate their views on the rest of us, or 2) they want to enrich their friends.
Now the Governor of New York wants to create tax-free zones:
Not everything, everyone, or everywhere in New York will be tax-free. The tax-free communities will be all of the state universities (and curiously a number of private universities) outside New York City. Companies that open shop in these communities will be exempt from sales, income, and property taxes. That’s better than living in New Hampshire. Better still, employees who work for businesses in the new tax free communities will be exempt from paying state income taxes. So if you are in the community you don’t pay tax. If you are outside, even by six inches, you do.
I agree that this is a terrible idea, as is. But if Governor Coumo is willing to go further and create libertarian free cities in his state, that would be pretty cool. Galt’s Gulch, NY could give the Free State Project in neighboring New Hampshire a run for its money.
Why did the IRS scrutinize “conservative” and “tea party” applications? It’s clear the orders came from Washington. Who ordered it? The IRS employees in Cincinnati were most likely just following the orders from Washington. Someone came up with the idea to have this scrutiny.
Ed Driscoll, The Ohio Players. A reminder that the IRS scandal includes the illegal disclosure of confidential applications for exempt status by right-side organizations to a left-side 501(c)(3).
Linda Beale, The real IRS scandal. To her, the real scandal is that anybody is paying attention.
Clearly there is value in keeping that Greek Revival facade, but there is no way that the owner of the property can reap that value. If there is a CVS there, I will go in and buy a bottle of Mountain Dew or get a prescription filled which will help pay the rent that the highest and best use yields the property owner. Having me look at the facade and imagine the men and women who thought that there was an ancient precedent for the new form of government that they were devising is tough to charge for.
That is why there needs to be some sort of public support for the preservation of historic structures.
I disagree. As much as I like cool old buildings, giving them special tax treatment means other people subsidize my aesthetic preferences. What makes that OK, but wrong to make me subsidize a velvet Elvis? The tax law has enough to do to fund the government; making it the Swiss Army Knife of public policy makes it not very good at anything.
Randy Barker, 59, of Chico, is off to three years and 10 months in federal prison where he can mull over the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, the amendment that established the federal income tax.
He’s associated with the so-called “Tax Challenger” community, a group that believes that the tax laws are unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
According to testimony presented at trial, Mr. Barker filed an income tax return in February 2009 that falsely claimed more than $1.4 million in interest income and falsely claimed that the same amount had been withheld in tax.
So paying tax returns is unconstitutional, but it’s just fine to file returns claiming that the government is sitting on a bunch of your money? I need to re-read my constitution.
The most interesting part to me:
This combination allowed Mr. Barker to claim a refund of $987,900 in allegedly overpaid income tax.
Evidence showed that, after receiving the refund, Mr. Barker and his wife spent most of the money within weeks by making extensive cash withdrawals and by purchasing a $495,000 house, more than $90,000 in home furnishings, and a truck.
So this guy managed to steal almost $1 million with a laughably stupid tax return. Sure, he got caught, but that money is gone forever. I suppose the IRS is just too busy examining prayers to stop cash from flying out the back door.
Flickr image courtesy Tim under Creative Commons license
I have joined an “amicus” brief to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on the Loving case against the IRS preparer regulation regime. Also on the brief are boggers Russ Fox and Jason Dinesen, as well as The Tax Foundation.
The IRS is appealing the district court ruling rejecting their power grab over preparers. Accounting Today reports:
The brief argues that the IRS violated the APA’s arbitrary and capricious standard in issuing the regulations, for example, by engaging in a flawed cost/benefit analysis under Executive Order 12866 in rejecting alternative approaches. “The IRS ignored the increased costs to consumers of tax-return preparation services in making this analysis,” said the brief.
Jason’s argument:
As an Enrolled Agent, Mr. Dinesen is not directly affected by the regulations. Nevertheless, Mr. Dinesen believes the regulations would have an indirect adverse effect on his business (and on Enrolled Agents generally) because the Registered Tax Return Preparer designation created by the regulations would have the effect of diminishing the value of the Enrolled Agent designation in the market for tax-preparation services, largely because the number of Registered Tax Return Preparers would be substantially greater than the number of Enrolled Agents.
Next to consumers, I think enrolled agents are the folks most harmed by the regulations. The RTRP designation would make it very difficult for EAs to market their much higher level of credentials.
Russ Fox is also an enrolled agent, but he raises different points:
As an Enrolled Agent, Mr. Fox is not directly affected by the regulations. Nevertheless, based on his extensive experience in tax practice, he has a number of objections to the regulations. In addition to the defects in the regulations described by the district court, the plaintiffs-appellees, and this brief, Mr. Fox objects to the regulations because the IRS already has ample statutorily authorized tools to apply against incompetent or unscrupulous tax-return preparers; because the regulations will not be effective in eliminating incompetent or unscrupulous tax-return preparers; because they will give a tacit stamp of approval to preparers who are not competent; because they will have the effect of driving many low-volume tax-return preparers out of business, thereby increasing the cost of tax-return preparation services for the clients of those preparers; and because administering the regulations will require scarce IRS resources that could be better used for other purposes, such as combatting identity theft.
He is correct, in my view.
My case:
Mr. Kristan objects to the regulations because they will reduce options for consumers of tax-preparation services by driving many low-volume but competent and conscientious tax-return preparers out of business because of the cost of compliance with the regulations; will increase the compliance cost and burden on low-volume tax-return preparers that remain in business; will increase the cost of tax preparation services without increasing the value of those services; will prompt some low-income individuals to resort to tax-return preparers who will evade compliance with the regulations; will prompt some low-income individuals to prepare their own returns, rather than using paid preparers, resulting in less accurate returns; will prompt some low-income individuals to cease filing altogether; will adversely affect Enrolled Agents by diminishing the value of their Enrolled Agent designation; and will likely ultimately be extended to CPAs, attorneys, and Enrolled Agents.
After the revelations regarding the IRS treatment of the administration’s political opponents, why would anyone think it wise to let the IRS regulate preparers? It makes as much sense as having prosecutors regulate defense attorneys.
Former IRS Commissioner Shulman, showing how bad he feels about politcal harassment under his watch.
The Worst Commissioner Ever returned to Washington yesterday to testify before a Senate committee on the IRS scandal. He bravely took responsibility for the targeting of disfavored political groups and apologized to the victims.
I certainly am not personally responsible for creating a list that had inappropriate criteria on it. And what I know, with the full facts that are out, is from the inspector general’s report, which doesn’t say that I’m responsible for that. With that said, this happened on my watch. And I very much regret that it happened on my watch.
In other words, I was just the boss, and you can’t blame me for what those crazy kids in Cincinnati do.
Lois Lerner, the head of the Internal Revenue Service office that targeted conservative groups, intends to invoke her constitutional right against self-incrimination and decline to answer questions about the matter when questioned by a congressional committee Wednesday.
Ms. Lerner, director of the tax-exempt-organizations division at the IRS, notified the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform through her attorney that she wouldn’t answer questions on the matter, according to a committee spokesman.
When it comes to the Bill of Rights, better late than never.
On Friday, May 17, 2013, the Maryland Court of Appeals denied the comptroller’s motion for reconsideration in Comptroller v. Wynne, which struck down the state’s application of credits against pass through income from S corporations; however, the court stayed implementation of the ruling to allow the comptroller to petition the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari.
It’s too bad that the cost of a sensible property tax is a big increase in a program that is a poverty trap for honest taxpayers and a pinata for thieves. The phase-outs of the EITC result in shockingly-high marginal tax rates on each additional dollar earned by relatively low-income taxpayers.
The EITC is refundable, which means it is really a welfare program run through tax returns. About 25% of the EITC is claimed “improperly,” which is a nice way to say it’s stolen. The annual cost of the Iowa EITC boost is estimated at $35 million, so the price of fixing a broken commercial property tax regime is an $8 million annual thief subsidy. So while the politicians celebrate their great compromise, Iowa’s petty thieves also have occasion to raise a glass, filled by you.
It is unlikely that Republicans will find Paul’s smoking gun, but the IRS scandal is almost certainly the result of political bias on some level. It is hard to believe that a group of officials would innocently pick terms like “Tea Party,” “patriot,” and “9/12” to single out organizations for additional scrutiny. It would be incredible to find such disinterested tone-deafness even in the most politically insulated of civil servants (and the IRS is far from insulated).
I doubt the White House left fingerprints on IRS efforts to harass political opponents (though it didn’t lift a finger to stop it). That leads to an even more depressing possibility: that the IRS went out its way to beat up on the President’s opponents on its own. Nobody blew the whistle. That means IRS management is so corrupt and political that it would go after the administration’s political opponents with only a wink and a nudge. And anybody who doesn’t think this was politically-motivated is kidding themselves.
And the IRS scandal was a subversion of democracy on a massive scale. The most fearsome and coercive arm of the administrative state embarked on a systematic effort to suppress citizen dissent against the party in power. Thomas Friedman is famous for musing that he wishes America could be China for a day. It turns out we’ve been China for a while.
With all the excitement over tax-exempt entities, it’s worth remembering that their returns — the 990 series — are due today for calendar-year filers. And if an organization fails to file 990s for three years, its exempt status lapses. Extensions are available, but they have to be filed today.
Late filing can be expensive. For small organizations, the penalty is $20 per day of late filing; for those with receipts over $1 million, its $100 per day. That adds up fast.
So let’s get started with this morning’s IRS Scandal news. The TIGTA report whose imminent release triggered the IRS announcement of the scandal last Friday came out yesterday. I covered it in a post last night. Other coverage:
It is no secret. This may hurt my libertarian credentials, but I believe the U.S. Congress should pass the Marketplace Fairness Act. The tax system is sound when built on a broad base and low rates. Broad base means you tax everything without regard to who is lobbying the legislature. It follows – and it really does follow – that the sales tax should be imposed on all personal consumption.
I can see a need for something like this, but I think it should be done by having a single point of compliance for sellers under a uniform set of rules, rather than subjecting internet sellers to the thousands of local tax systems. David minimizes the compliance burden. As somebody who makes a living off of the compliance burden, I can say with confidence that he is mistaken.
Steven Miller, acting head of the IRS since Doug Shulman left office, apparently hasn’t been any more honest than The Worst Commissioner Ever about IRS harassment of right-side political groups. AP reports:
Miller was first informed on May, 3, 2012, that applications for tax-exempt status by tea party groups were inappropriately singled out for extra scrutiny, the IRS said Monday.
At least twice after the briefing, Miller wrote letters to members of Congress to explain the process of reviewing applications for tax-exempt status without disclosing that tea party groups had been targeted.
We’re supposed to tell the truth when we file our returns. It’s not asking too much for them to return the favor.
The incompetence boggles the mind. It’s also bewildering how the Service could sit in front of GOP lawmakers and chastise them for underfunding tax enforcement when employees were using some of those supposedly precious funds to conduct a politically charged vendetta against conservative exempt organizations.
I think the perpetrators were quite competent in doing what they set out to do. The only incompetence was in getting caught. But he’s absolutely right that the agency’s poor-mouthing, including next week’s furloughs, will no longer convince anybody.
But it still disturbs me that no one in Washington really seemed to care until the behavior went public.
Many of us didn’t believe the IRS would really do something so outrageous. I had seen some of the questions that IRS was asking Tea Party outfits, and they seemed out of line, but I figured the IRS was being an equal-opportunity annoyance. That they did it politically is what is triggering the outrage.
Tax.com has moved. For reasons that elude me, Tax Analysts has apparently given up the handy Tax.com domain and moved their excellent group blog to a tab on their home page, Tax.org. I think that’s a mistake, but it’s worth going out of your way to find it.
It’s Tuesday, so it’s Buzz Day at Robert D. Flach’s place.
Career Advice. Protip: Threatening to Kill Your Colleagues, Even in the Midst of a Brutal Busy Season, Is Never Cool(Going Concern). OK, I take it back. Mistakes were made. There was no threat intended in my overzealous pursuit of tax return excellence. It was just an administrative shortcut. OK, incompetent, but not evil. I vow to find out exactly what happened. If I threatened anyone, it was outrageous.
If the IRS hoped Friday’s “apology” for giving extra special attention to tax-exemption applications of right-side groups would settle things, they’re very disappointed this weekend. The Washington Post reports that the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration will soon issue a report saying Friday’s apologizer, IRS Director, Exempt Organizations, knew this was going on in 2011. Meanwhile, in 2012 IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman was still testifying that IRS was not picking on the Tea Party.
So not only was the Shulman era at IRS grasping, incompetent and casually cruel, it was dishonest.
The documents, obtained by The Washington Post from a congressional aide with knowledge of the findings, show that the IRS field office in charge of evaluating applications for tax-exempt status decided to focus on groups making statements that “criticize how the country is being run” and those that were involved in educating Americans “on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.”
Yes, we sure need to keep an eye on those wingnuts who want to educate people on the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Dangerous lunatics, they are!
There is so much blog coverage of this that I won’t even try to round it all up. A few links from our blogroll:
The report doesn’t shay whether or not Shulman was informed about the Tea Party questioning, but it does show the IRS’s chief counsel was. It’s standard procedure for the counsel and commissioner to discuss this sort of thing before a Congressional hearing.
If so, The Worst Commissioner Ever can only plead incompetence instead of lying to Congress.
Nina Olson, IRS Taxpayer Advocate, has an article in Tax Analysts (via the TaxProf) affirming her support for taxpayer regulation. Ms. Olson has done much good work as Taxpayer Advocate, but her support for increased preparer regulation is economically uninformed and hopelessly wrongheaded.
I’d like to report a hijacking. It looks like somebody at Tax Analysts forgot to renew their ownership of the tax.com domain name. Going there this morning gets this:
Tax.com is (has been?) home to the great group blog featuring, among others, David Brunori, Christopher Bergin, David Cay Johnston, Martin Sullivan, Cara Griffith and Clint Stretch. I hope this is only a temporary hijacking.
Politicians advance plan to allow politicians to give more tax money to private businesses. From TheGazette.com:
Iowa communities would be able to designate special 25-acre development zones and use a share of sales tax and hotel-motel tax revenues to assist private projects of at least $10 million under legislation that’s getting bipartisan support.
House File 641 would establish reinvestment districts designed to spur development of “big ideas,” said Sen. Matt McCoy, D-Des Moines, who led a Senate Ways and Means subcommittee that revamped the bill representatives approved 87-9 last month.
This is, of course, an awful idea. Politicians are notoriously bad at allocating investment capital, and they tend to make sure it goes to their cronies and contributors. But when the state’s Governor, a member of the purported small government party, does an end-zone dance over a giant federal subsidy to a private utility controlled by a billionaire, the battlefield is left to the crony capitalists. The House version of HF 641 passed 87-9.
New York State’s comptroller says giving $2.8 billion in tax breaks over five years added more than a million jobs, which would be great news except that the state lost jobs.
I’m confident Iowa’s job-creating tax breaks work just as well.
For capital gains, the current law is already out-of-step with international standards. After the fiscal cliff, combined state and federal capital gains rates increased from 19.1 percent to 28 percent. This is more than 10 percentage points higher than the international average. One suggestion, of course, is to tax capital gains at the rate at the 1986 rate of 28 percent. This would push America’s average combined federal and state capital gains rate to more than 35 percent, more than double the international average.
A chance traffic stop on I-75 in Lee County uncovers a massive tax fraud scheme. Deputies say the woman accused used her job to steal personal information – even stealing from people who were dead.
Thursday, 23-year-old Tequila Gordon was sitting in the Lee County Jail. Her bond was set at $72,000.
Prosecutors say she worked at liberty tax services in 2009 and stole personal information from dozens of people.
I would think having a first name of “Tequila” would make getting a good job challenging. It won’t be any easier now.
Search for the Tax Fairy leads to federal prison. The Tax Fairy, in the imagination of believers, appears in the form of magical legal maneuvers that make your taxes all go away. Your drinking buddies may even claim to have seen it, or that their tax guy knows her.
It can hurt when you find that there is no Tax Fairy. It must hurt for one South Dakota surgeon. From RapidCityJournal.com:
Friends and family described Dr. Edward Picardi as a compassionate, highly skilled surgeon, but the accolades failed to spare the doctor a five-year prison sentence for income tax evasion on Tuesday.
Despite the good the Sturgis man was proclaimed to have done in his life, Picardi, 56, is the same man a federal jury convicted of 13 felonies last October, U.S. Chief District Judge Jeffrey Viken said when he sentenced the doctor.
Picardi was charged with income tax evasion after an exhaustive federal investigation of his financial practices spanning 10 years from 1999 through 2009. He used an elaborate network of dummy corporations and several foreign banks to divert thousands of dollars in income.
The indictment says the scheme was hatched with the aid of a Maryland attorney who set up a phony employee leasing scheme to suck taxable income to shell companies, which the surgeon tapped for cash as needed. This worked fine, until one day it didn’t, and now it’s a five-year unpaid vacation, plus tax, interest and penalties.
There is no Tax Fairy.
Jana Luttenegger, Disclaiming an Inheritance (Davis Brown Tax Law Blog). Sometimes it’s better estate planning to turn down an inheritance and let it go to your kids or some other beneficiary. But you have to do it right:
Most importantly, the disclaimer must be made before you accept any benefit in the gift, and it must be an unqualified disclaimer. (No, you can’t have a party at the house and then decide you don’t want it.) Once the disclaimer is made, it is irrevocable — you can’t change your mind. If you properly disclaim, the property will pass as if you predeceased (you do not get to direct where the property goes).
The looming debate over the federal debt limit is a depressing reminder that we’re living in the Age of the Manufactured Crisis. And it encourages a sort of political nostalgia – a yearning for that bygone era when tough lawmakers made the tough decisions that kept federal debt at manageable levels. Well, sorry to tell you, but there were never any fiscal heroes.
Just politicians who show by their actions that they are happy to spend us to Greece.
Jason Dinesen, Same-Sex Marriage, Community Property, And Multi-State Income — Part 1. ”Indeed, some of the most complicated tax returns I’ve ever prepared have been for same-sex couples that moved from California (a community property state) to Iowa (not a community property state) during the middle of the year.”
Think of it as the ballpark program you pick up before a baseball game. You can watch the game without it, but it is much more fun if you can keep score and know a little something about who plays for the visiting team.
Except much less interesting than baseball, and the players are uglier and less skilled.
Lauryn Hill’s parents are 150 years old! The singer received a three-month prison sentence yesterday for failing to file tax returns, but the New Jersey native still may struggle with math, according to the reliable source of tax news, TMZ.com:
“I was put into a system I didn’t know the nature of. … I’m a child of former slaves. I got into an economic paradigm and had that imposed on me,” Hill said.
She continued, “I sold 50 million units … now I’m up here paying a tax debt. If that’s not likened to slavery, I don’t know what is.”
As slavery was eliminated nearly 150 years ago with the passage of the 13th Amendment, Ms. Hill either has difficulty with arithmetic or remarkable parents. The slavery analogy is interesting. So if tax is slavery, is President Obama the chief slave driver? The IRS Commissioner? Can we be sold down the river? To who?
Ideas that would work perfectly well in song lyrics can sound so wrong in court. The artist describes feelings, impressionistically. It’s in no way an excuse or justification. But sometimes artists/politicos use court as a forum for expression without any expectation that it will advance their legal cause. One can intelligently and consciously eschew persuasion and victory.
Perhaps. Still, sometimes celebrities just say strange things.
New U.K. film tax credit indictments. It appears that the Brits are slowly moving towards the Iowa approach of jailing filmmakers instead of subsidizing them. Ic.Scotland.co.uk reports:
Five people are to be charged in connection with a film industry tax relief fraud which cost the public purse around £125 million, the Crown Prosecution Service said.
The group allegedly abused a tax relief that allows investors in the British film industry to offset losses against other tax liabilities in order to cheat the public revenue.
“Around £125 million” translates to around $194 million. And in Iowa film producers are serving time for stealing merely single digits of millions. It just goes to show what you can accomplish with a national effort.
Boo. House bill would give IRS authority to regulate tax pros(Kay Bell) The power grabbers at IRS and their buddies at the national franchise tax prep firms have been thwarted by the courts. Now they are using their congresscritter friends to put in the fix.
Kay sadly falls for it:
The quality independent tax professionals are following tax law changes, staying up to date and providing their clients with reliable tax services. Down the street, however, an inept preparer is undercutting their prices and mucking up the system for all of us — the IRS, tax pros and taxpayers alike.
The IRS can’t regulate anybody into competency. They can make people pass a “competency” test that really is a literacy test. They can make people pay for CPE. But they can’t make anybody competent who wouldn’t be otherwise. What they can do is drive little preparers out of the business with nagging paperwork, red tape and hassles that the big boys can just assign to their compliance departments, and, when necessary, to their lobbyists. This reduces the supply of preparers, increasing the cost of preparation for taxpayers.
The real problem with tax errors isn’t preparers; it’s the horrendous tax law and the inept legislators who make it happen.
In a 2011 paper published by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Veronique de Rugy and Adam Thierer recommended “an ‘origin-based’ sourcing rule for any states seeking to impose sales tax collection obligations on interstate vendors.” Under that rule, which mirrors what happens when you buy something while visiting another state, each business collects sales tax on behalf of the state where it is based, no matter where the customer happens to be.
The beauty of this approach is that it treats all retailers equally, eliminates the daunting challenge of dealing with many different taxing authorities, and respects state policy choices while encouraging tax competition between jurisdictions. Evidently the idea makes too much sense for Congress to consider.
That would motivate online sellers to locate in low tax jurisdictions, which is why congresscritters from high-tax places will never allow it to happen.
The tax, which took effect Jan. 1, applies to the “net investment income” of married joint filers who have more than $250,000 of income (or $200,000 for singles). Only investment income—such as dividends, interest and capital gains—above the thresholds is taxed. The rate is a flat 3.8% in addition to other taxes owed.
“Affluent investors who ignore this tax will be in for a total shock next April 15,” says David Lifson, a certified public accountant specializing in tax at Crowe Horwath in New York. Such income is typically not subject to withholding, and people won’t be factoring it into their estimated taxes. Lower-bracket taxpayers who receive a windfall large enough to owe the tax will also be in for a surprise.
This tax is shockingly complex, and it will surprise a lot of taxpayers next April.
Feds sue over Des Moines utility tax (Des Moines Register). Des Moines lost a long legal battle over its “utility tax” on electric bills. Now the federal government is after the city:
Federal prosecutors acting on behalf of the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs sued the city of Des Moines and MidAmerican Energy Co. on Friday, alleging that the city’s longstanding surcharge on gas and electric customers in Des Moines constitutes an illegal tax when levied against Uncle Sam.
When a taxpayer wins a jackpot, the casino gives them the W-2G for the win at that time. It’s up to the taxpayer to keep the W-2G safe and bring it into me, or their preparer, when their taxes are done. What happens to the W-2G? It gets shoved into a purse or pocket, thrown in the glove compartment or on the desk at home or thrown in the trash by accident.
I support keeping the deduction for acquisition debt mortgage interest on one’s primary personal residence, and the deduction for real estate taxes on the same primary personal residence, not to encourage home ownership, but as a form of “geographical equalization”.
In other words, he wants to help out people who live in places where houses cost more. I think that’s misguided, as it also encourages people who live in low-cost locales like Des Moines to build palaces with help from the taxman.
Russ Fox, 1700 Miles and a 7% Difference. Joe Mauer of the Minnesota Twins tries to avoid Minnesota residency for low-tax Florida. It went about as well as this season will for the Florida Marlins (or the Twins, for that matter).
Paul Neiffer, Don’t Forget Your Retirement Plan. “I was talking with a new farm client the other day about his estate plan and what struck me the most was not how much farm land value he had accumulated but rather the amount he had tucked away into his retirement plans.”
Get some competent advice about how to handle the past years. If the advice is OVDI, then stand up and walk away, swearing the mightiest oaths that a drunken sailor could swear.
Perhaps the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative has somehow failed to gain the confidence of the tax bar?
Just because an LLC is taxed like a partnership doesn’t mean that every LLC owner can act like a general partner, as Colleen MacRaeexplains:
Last week the Iowa Court of Appeals in Three Minnows, LLC v. Cream LLC, held that a non-managing member did not have the authority to bind an LLC to a contract the member signed on behalf of the limited liability company.
24 current and former employees of the Internal Revenue Service have been charged for crimes relating to fraudulently obtaining more than $250,000 in government benefits. Thirteen of the current and former IRS employees have been charged federally with making false statements to obtain unemployment insurance payments, food stamps, welfare, and housing vouchers. All thirteen, individually charged in separate indictments, are alleged to have falsely stated that they were unemployed while applying for or recertifying those government benefits.
They may have been right about being unemployed, just wrong about the timing.
The headline producing data in the report was that revenue loss – about $181 billion – from corporate tax expenditures in 2011 was “approximately the same size as the amount of corporate income tax revenue the federal government collected that year.” That makes a headline grabber; here would be my version: “Corporations Got More in Tax Breaks Than They Paid in Taxes, Government Says.”
It’s almost like the tax exists only so the politicians can carve loopholes for their friends.
Kyle Pomerleau, TPC, What About the “Pass-Throughs?”. (Tax Policy Blog). Measuring business taxes needs to look beyond corporation taxes when most businesses are taxed on 1040s.
David Cay Johnston, Promises, Promises(Tax.com). “Candidate Obama promised in 2008 to reform the Alternative Minimum Tax, and President Obama promised at least an honest accounting in his first budget, but his proposed budget for Fiscal 2014 is silent on the issue.”
Iowa Senate Republicans advance income tax plan. TheGazette.com reports:
Sen. Randy Feenstra, R-Hull, said all 24 minority Senate Republicans have signed onto a proposal to significantly lower state personal income tax rates and simplify the Iowa tax code by offering a two-pronged approach that would eliminate federal deductibility and benefit most Iowans.
…
The Hull Republican said the proposed new tax structure would flatten the current nine income tax brackets into three, elimination of federal deductibility as a competitive impediment, enhance the current standard deduction for all taxpayers and provide an extra boost for blind, elderly and dependent Iowans, eliminate itemized deduction, increase personal exemption credits, and raise filing thresholds.
So far I have been unable to find the bill (though it being April 11, I’m not going to spend a lot of time looking for it today). As Senate Republicans have no chance of advancing a bill in the face of majority Democratic opposition, it’s really a gesture. Still, it’s nice to see that income tax reform remains alive, in spite of the Governor’s indifference this year. It’s also nice to see that the insistence on keeping the deduction for federal taxes is eroding. Much better to build it into a lower rate.
This is a bit weird given that President Obama rides on what is essentially the nicest corporate jet in the world. To be fair, the President is quite right that companies do not need a tax break to buy corporate jets. But since they don’t really get a tax break for buying corporate jets, we probably don’t need to spend this much valuable presidential time worrying about this non-problem.
Anything to make life difficult for a high-tech U.S. manufacturer. As long as the President continues to beat dead horses like this and the “Buffett Rule,” we know he is not at all serious.
Sure, Democrats pay lip-service to infrastructure, education, and the like. But for the most part, they are profoundly unwilling to make a wholistic case for activist, progressive government.
Actually, they probably wouldn’t get very far making the case honestly.
Flickr image by Samat Jain under Creative Commons license
Should we just get a bill from the IRS, instead of filing returns? That’s something Janet Novack seems to be thinking about. She has two guest posts on the issue:
Some people fear return-free filing will separate citizens further from the costs of government. I think that is caused by an income tax that now is effectively only on high-income earners. When 51% can send the bill to the other 49%, bad policy seems inevitable.
It makes me wonder: if there are “Errors to avoid,” are there errors we should seek out, or at least not sweat? I can’t think of errors I’d want to make on a tax return, but I can think of some that I wouldn’t lose sleep over:
1. Forgetting to check the “presidential election campaign fund” box. After all, your entire tax bill is basically the federal election campaign fund.
2. Misspelling the name of a stock on Schedule D.
3. Writing a “smiley face” next to the tax refund line.
4. Forgetting to update your “occupation” on the signature line when you change jobs.
The core problem is that the IRS cannot look into the hearts of companies and see which of them really needs to provide free lunch to their employees in order to have a healthy, vibrant company, and which of them is doing this in order to provide a tax-free boon to their workers.
In case anyone asks, donuts are critical to a healthy, vibrant tax practice.
Radio Iowa runs with this headline ”$8.7 million from “Development Fund” creates 600+ jobs.” This headline arises out a “study” paid for by the economic development bureaucracy (meaning: taxpayers) to demonstrate the tremendous job-creating skills of people who give your money to other people. How did this study demonstrate this job creation?
By assuming it.
From the “study”:
A survey of past recipients of Demonstration Fund investments was conducted by the Iowa Innovation Corporation to determine, among other things, how large these companies are now as compared to their pre-investment levels. This growth in size – in annual revenues and in head count – can be attributed in part to the involvement of and investment by the Demonstration Fund.
Furthermore, the resulting economic impact is greater than the direct increase in expenditures and head count, since those increases lead to a series of spillover effects, whereby the impact of new company spending and employee earnings ripples through local economies and supports additional economic activity and job creation. Job impact estimates are determined by using standard input-output methodologies and multipliers, as provided by the US Department of Commerce.
- that the businesses and jobs wouldn’t happen without the wonderful effects of your money being directed by politicians to those businesses.
- that the money wouldn’t have also generated jobs if it had been spent elsewhere.
That’s the same kind of thinking behind the 2009 stimulus spending spree. The results were less than assumed. The dark line is what government projected that spending would do to unemployment, using “standard multipliers.” The lighter blue line was the grim fate awaiting us absent a government binge. The red dots are the actual post-binge unemployment rates.
The study does not have the two words that could have given it credibility: “opportunity cost.” They assume that the money left in the hands of taxpayers would have done nothing. But it would have been spent elsewhere, undirected by politicians; it would have bought things, creating profits and jobs. But as they would have gone unclaimed by economic development officials, no press conference could have been called, so they don’t count.
Obama consistently ignores the statutory timeline for releasing his budget, and this year is the latest he has ever put forward a fiscal proposal. On all things administrative, the president is frequently dilatory. But those waiting with bated breath for Obama’s proposals will be disappointed — the budget will be more of the same and has little chance of actually being passed or even taken up by Congress.
Apparently, President Obama’s budget is going to include some kind of penalty for people who have accumulated more than $3 million in retirement accounts. The details are not yet known, but I think we know enough to say that this is a terrible idea.
A sizable body of work in public finance suggests that consumption taxes are preferable to income taxes. Completely replacing our tax system with a better one is, however, hard. Retirement accounts, such as IRAs and 401k plans, are one way our tax code has gradually evolved from an income tax toward a consumption tax. The use of these accounts should be encouraged, not discouraged.
Unlike some of his other bad ideas, this one isn’t going anywhere.
One of our last posts indicated that the IRS had issued a notice indicating they might not assess the late payment penalty for returns that are extended and paid after April 15, 2013 if the return included certain forms that were delayed by the new tax law.
However, when you read the fine print, it appears that you still need to accurately estimate your tax and pay in at least 90% of this extra tax to escape the penalty.
The IRS language is:
For each taxpayer who requests or has requested an extension to file a 2012 income tax return that includes one of the forms listed in Exhibit 1 of this Notice, the IRS will deem the taxpayer to have demonstrated reasonable cause and lack of willful neglect, provided a good faith effort was made to properly estimate the tax liability on the extension application, the estimated amount is paid by the original due date of the return, and any tax owed on the return is fully paid no later than the extended due date of the return.
I suspect that the IRS will not be very strict in making taxpayers demonstrate reasonable cause, but if you have the cash, you should pay up.
One of her clients mailed his tax return to the IRS but forgot to seal the envelope. The return did make it to the IRS, but without page two of Schedule C. The first that the client found out there was a problem was when the IRS sent him a letter noting the omission. The second time he knew that there was a problem was when she found she was a victim of identity theft.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Disclaimer
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Howard Gleckman, Let Legal Marijuana Dispensaries Deduct Their Business Expenses. Even when states legalize it, punitive tax rules make it almost impossible to sell legal pot profitably.
New U.K. film tax credit indictments. It appears that the Brits are slowly moving towards the Iowa approach of jailing filmmakers instead of subsidizing them. 
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
