I shouldn’t e-file, they might notice me. There remain some people who worry that by filing electronically, they make it more likely that the IRS will cause them trouble. Their numbers are shrinking, according to this IRS press release:
The Internal Revenue Service announced today the number of tax returns e-filed by businesses rose nearly 9 percent this year, continuing the growth in the number of corporate and partnership returns filed electronically. This year, an additional 625,000 corporations and partnerships chose to e-file their tax returns.
As of Sept. 20, almost 8 million corporations and partnerships e-filed their income tax returns. The IRS estimates that e-file accounts for 77 percent of all corporate and partnership returns filed during 2015. Many corporations and partnerships operating on a calendar year receive filing extensions. The due date for filing a return after filing for an extension is usually Sept. 15.
I like e-filing for a number of reasons. I like that we can be sure the return is actually filed and received on time by the IRS, especially when there is a time-sensitive election, or a foreign information return that can trigger a $10,000 penalty if filed late. As you can now e-file most extra forms, like elections and signed charitable contribution Form 8283 appraisal statements, it’s become more convenient. And I think that any time an IRS employee has to touch your return, you increase the risk of an IRS mistake, or of IRS curiosity.
Russ Fox, IRS to Tax Professionals: Rules for Thee but Not for Us. Russ discusses the IRS rules for preparers on safeguarding taxpayer data, including this:
6. Do not mail unencrypted sensitive personal information.
There’s nothing wrong with these recommendations; in fact, they’re excellent. But note that the IRS says that authorized e-file providers that participate in the role as an Online Provider must follow these rules.
I highlighted the last rule (#6, above) regarding mailing unencrypted sensitive personal information. Why? Because the IRS is one of the biggest offenders in this area.
Yet serious people think that this agency, which can’t even run its own shop, should regulate preparers more.
Robert D. Flach offers fresh-picked hand-crafted Friday Buzz. His links today range from the effects of high tax regimes to the early distribution penalty for IRAs
Colleen Graffy, The Law That Makes U.S. Expats Toxic (Wall Street Journal):
Aimed at preventing money laundering, the financing of terrorism and tax evasion, Fatca requires foreign financial institutions such as banks to report the identities of their American customers and any assets those Americans hold. Institutions that don’t comply are subject to a 30% withholding tax on any of their own transactions in the U.S.
This provision was enacted without regard for its effects on the 8.7 million U.S. citizens living abroad, who have essentially been declared guilty of financial crimes unless they can prove otherwise. Many institutions no longer consider their American clients worth the burden and potential penalties of the law, and are abandoning them in droves.
This isn’t news for regular readers here, but it is for almost everyone else. Yet the politicians who smugly imposed this outrageous regime blithely move on to other targets, like the “carried interests.” And so many people trust the politicians to “solve” the “problem” without doing massive damage — despite all history and evidence to the contrary.
Glenn Reynolds, If You Tax It Too Much, They Will Go (USA Today). “IRS data show that taxpayers are migrating from high-tax states like New York, Illinois, and California to low-tax states like Texas and Florida. And it’s not just sports stars or star scientists, doing that, but fairly ordinary people — though, of course, people who earn enough money to pay taxes.”
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 883. In which he features Peter Reilly’s discussion of whether his scandal coverage has “jumped the shark.” So meta. I get a mention.
Kyle Pomerleau, The Key Component of the Estonia’s Competitive Tax System (Tax Policy Blog).
There are many impressive features in the Estonian tax code. It has a flat individual income tax rate of 20 percent, a broad-based 20 percent value-added tax, and has few distortive taxes such as the estate tax or financial transaction taxes.
All of those features contribute the Estonia’s high score. However, the most important and competitive feature of the Estonian tax code is its corporate income tax system. And not only is its corporate tax system competitive with a low, 20 percent rate, it is unique among OECD countries in how it works.
The Estonian corporate income tax is what is called a cash-flow tax. Rather than requiring corporations to calculate their taxable income using complex rules and depreciation schedules every single year, the Estonian corporate income tax of 20 percent is only levied on a business when it pays its profits out to its shareholders.
I prefer that corporations be taxed as income is earned and that they be allowed to deduct payments to shareholders, but the Estonian way has an advantage. The business owners are never taxed until they actually get something out of the business. There is no possibility of income tax exceeding corporation income over its life that way, which can easily happen in our system.
Steven Rosenthal, Making Wall Street Pay—Proposals from the Campaign Trail (TaxVox). There’s no shortage of stupid out there on the trail.
Career Corner. Reminder: Please Take Vacation So You Don’t Die (Leona May, Going Concern).