The Des Moines Register is running a series on Jack Hatch, the Democratic nominee for Iowa Governor, focusing on subsidized housing projects he developed. The stories include Jack Hatch’s record shows no clear conflicts of interest and Review shows Hatch followed public financing rules.
The Register finds no evidence of illegality in Sen. Hatch’s tax credit-driven deals. That’s unsurprising, as the tax credits are shared with investors, who want clean tax projects and impeccable tax breaks. As usual with tax incentives, though, the scandal is what is perfectly legal.
The series describes the financing of some projects. For example:
A $6.5 million development with over $8 million in government aid. A sweet deal, if you are one of the lucky participants of an oversubscribed subsidy program.
While such projects are touted as achieving “affordable housing,” the real beneficiaries are arguably well-connected developers and tax shelter investors. It’s all legal, and all paid for by the rest of us.
If the real goal is to help the poor, there are better ways than a Rube Goldberg tax credit system running the aid through tax shelter developers and investors. Arnold Kling’s idea to provide the poor with a universal flexible benefit “to replace all forms of means-tested assistance, including food stamps, housing subsidies, Medicaid, and the EITC, with a single cash benefit,” is a more promising approach. It is what a program designed to help the poor, rather than the connected, would look like.
Kay Bell, Elvis estate seeks tax breaks for Graceland expansion. Or what? Graceland is going to leave Tennessee? Elvis will leave the building? But, but, jobs! Or something.
Robert D. Flach, KEEP COPIES OF YOUR W-2s FOREVER! Robert explains how he was able to use old W-2s to help a client show that his retirement contributions were “after tax” for New Jersey purposes, preventing a second tax on withdrawal.
William Perez, Got a Call From the IRS? It’s Probably Not the IRS. A client of our office got such a scam call last week. We told them to hang up if they call back.
Jack Townsend, Tidbits on the New Streamlined Procedures
Annette Nellen, Better identity theft efforts – S. 2736
Jason Dinesen, Why an LPA? Jason answers the question “Why did I pursue an Iowa “Licensed Public Accountant” designation? LPAs are an obscure lot, in that we only really exist in 3 states (Iowa, Delaware and Minnesota).”
Peter Reilly, IRS Stampedes A Cattle Shelter. Peter explains why losing a hobby loss case is extra bad. With a bonus quote from me (Thanks, Peter!).
TaxGrrrl, From AR-15s To Rubber Bullets: How Did Police End Up With Military Gear On American Streets? Your tax dollars at work. Amazingly, no tax credits appear to be involved.
TaxProf, The IRS Scandal, Day 466. It appears the judge who told the IRS to explain what happened to the Lois Lerner emails isn’t yet satisfied with the IRS response. More from Russ Fox: Judge Sullivan Not Impressed by the “Dog Ate my Homework” Excuse.
Ajay Gupta, Demagoguing the ‘I’ Words. (Tax Analysts Blog) “If an inversion exploits a loophole, then so does every other corporate reorganization that painstakingly adheres to the requirements of the code and regs.”
Steven Rosenthal, Can Obama slow corporate inversions? Yes he can. Silly rabbit. The idea isn’t to slow corporate diversions; it’s to demonize them for political fun and profit. And his idea of reviving the moribund Sec. 385 debt-equity regulations for this purpose shows how much the inversion panic has parted from reality.
News from the Profession. Here’s Further Proof That Accounting Firms Need a Charge Code for “Wasting Time on Internet” (Caleb Newquist, Going Concern)